The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Disability progression in multiple sclerosis is slower than previously reported
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate disease progression and risk factors in a large geographically based population with multiple sclerosis (MS), using two different inception points--clinical onset and date of birth. METHODS: The authors reviewed a database of subjects with definite MS and symptom onset prior to July 1988. The main outcome was sustained progression to Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) 6 (requires a cane), using the date of birth and date of MS onset as inception points in separate analyses. Risk factors examined were sex, relapsing vs primary progressive course, onset age, and onset symptoms. RESULTS: The study included 2,837 patients, followed prospectively for 22,723 patient years. The median time to EDSS 6 was 27.9 years, 15 years after onset; only 21% reached EDSS 6, and by age 50, 28% required a cane. Men progressed 38% more quickly than women from onset (p < 0.0005), yet both required canes at similar ages: 58.8 years for men and 60.1 for women (p = 0.082). A younger onset age predicted a slower progression, but those older at onset were consistently older when reaching EDSS 6. A primary progressive course predicted a more rapid progression from both onset (p < 0.0005) and birth (hazard ratio = 2.7 [95% CI: 2.2 to 3.3]). No onset symptom consistently predicted progression. CONCLUSION: Disability progression in multiple sclerosis (MS) accrued more slowly than found in earlier longitudinal studies. The authors also challenged two fundamental concepts in MS, demonstrating that neither male sex nor older onset age was associated with worse disease outcome.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Defining high, medium, and low impact prognostic factors for developing multiple sclerosis
Tintore, M., Rovira, À., Río, J., Otero-Romero, S., Arrambide, G., Tur, C., Comabella, M., Nos, C., Arévalo, M. J., Negrotto, L., et al. (2015) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awv105 · Cited by 530
Impact of Walking Impairment in Multiple Sclerosis: Perspectives of Patients and Care Partners
LaRocca, N. G. (2011) · The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research · doi:10.2165/11591150-000000000-00000 · Cited by 507
Epidemiology of multiple sclerosis
Leray, E., Moreau, T., Fromont, A., & Edan, G. (2016) · Revue Neurologique · doi:10.1016/j.neurol.2015.10.006 · Cited by 478
New natural history of interferon‐β–treated relapsing multiple sclerosis
Trojano, M., Pellegrini, F., Fuiani, A., Paolicelli, D., Zipoli, V., Zimatore, G. B., Di Monte, E., Portaccio, E., Lepore, V., Livrea, P., et al. (2007) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.21102 · Cited by 270
Ribbons, K. A., McElduff, P., Boz, C., Trojano, M., Izquierdo, G., Duquette, P., Girard, M., Grand’Maison, F., Hupperts, R., Grammond, P., et al. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0122686 · Cited by 190
Metadata
- Authors
- Tremlett, H., Paty, D., & Devonshire, V.
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 2006-01-24
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 172-177
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W2161512391
- Cited by
- 343
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Disability progression in multiple sclerosis is slower than previously reported. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/01.wnl.0000194259.90286.fe
- The paper
- Tremlett, H., Paty, D., & Devonshire, V. (2006). Disability progression in multiple sclerosis is slower than previously reported. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000194259.90286.fe
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.