Cited by 90Acute Ischemic Stroke ManagementCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery DiseasesIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research

Decreasing incidence of lacunar vs other types of cerebral infarction in a Japanese population

Kubo, M., Kiyohara, Y., Ninomiya, T., Tanizaki, Y., Yonemoto, K., Doi, Y., Hata, J., Oishi, Y. +2 more·2006·Neurology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is scant information on secular trends in the incidence and survival of ischemic stroke subtypes. METHODS: The authors established three cohorts of Hisayama residents age > or =40 years in 1961 (1,618 subjects), 1974 (2,038 subjects), and 1988 (2,637 subjects). They followed up with each cohort for 12 years, comparing the incidence and survival rate of ischemic stroke subtypes. Morphologic examinations by autopsy or brain imaging was performed on most of the ischemic stroke cases in all cohorts. RESULTS: The age-standardized incidence of lacunar infarction significantly declined by 59% for men and by 28% for women from the first to the second cohort. It continued to decline by 41% for men, but the decline decelerated for women between the second and third cohort. The age-standardized incidence of atherothrombotic infarction tended to decline from the first to the second cohort, whereas it was sustained between the second and third cohort for both sexes. The age-standardized incidence of cardioembolic infarction was unchanged throughout the cohorts. In these cohorts, mean blood pressure levels among hypertensive subjects and the prevalence of current smoker decreased with time, though the prevalence of hypertension remained stable. The 5-year survival rate after lacunar infarction significantly improved among the cohorts, but those of atherothrombotic and cardioembolic infarction did not. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that, in the Japanese population, the incidence of lacunar infarction steadily declined for the last 40 years. The improvement of hypertension control and decreasing prevalence of smoking might be responsible for this trend.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/01.wnl.0000216132.95207.b4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 26 · Cited by 90

Authors
Kubo, M., Kiyohara, Y., Ninomiya, T., Tanizaki, Y., Yonemoto, K., Doi, Y., Hata, J., Oishi, Y., Shikata, K., & Iida, M.
Affiliations
Kyushu University (JP)
Venue
Neurology
Published
2006-05
Volume
66
Issue
10
Pages
1539-1544
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2026997998
Cited by
90
References
26
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
Keywords
lacunar infarction, ischemic stroke subtypes, secular trends, stroke incidence, stroke survival, atherothrombotic infarction, cardioembolic stroke, hypertension control, smoking prevalence, Japanese population
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Intracranial Arteriosclerosis, Cerebral Infarction, Brain Ischemia, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Hypertension, Japan, Male, Middle Aged, Morbidity, Mortality, Risk Factors, Smoking, Social Change, Suburban Population, Cohort Studies, Life Tables, Incidence, Prevalence, Survival Rate, Survival Analysis, Glucose Intolerance, Intracranial Embolism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review