Probable medication-overuse headache: The effect of a 2-month drug-free period
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe the emerging profile of headache frequency following a 2-month drug-free period in patients with medication overuse. METHODS: All patients treated and discharged from Danish Headache Center in 2002 and 2003 had prospectively filled out a diagnostic headache diary on a daily basis. For patients with probable medication-overuse headache (MOH), the authors determined headache frequencies before and after medication withdrawal from these prospective recordings. RESULTS: Among 1,326 patients, 337 had probable MOH. Two hundred sixteen patients who stayed medication-free for 2 months were eligible. Overall, 45% of the patients improved, 48% had no change, and 7% had more headaches. Median age was 48 years, and male/female ratio 1:2.7. The relative reduction in headache frequency varied considerably with a 67% median reduction in migraine, 0% in tension-type headache (TTH), and 37% in patients with both migraine and TTH (MT). Comparing the diagnostic groups, the relative reduction in frequency differed between migraine and TTH (p < 0.001) and between MT and TTH (p < 0.01). Triptan/ergot overusers improved the most (p < 0.0001). The difference between MT and TTH remained significant when triptan/ergot overuse was controlled (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate the benefit of withdrawal in already established medication overuse and support the existence of medication-overuse headache as a clinical entity.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The percentage of patients with probable medication overuse headache was 38-65% smaller than in other studies.
“The percentage of patients with pMOH was 38–65 % smaller than in other studies [10, 11].”
From Prevalence, management and burden of episodic and chronic headaches—a cross-sectional multicentre study in eight Austrian headache centres (2015) · cites this paper as [10]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 13 · Cited by 153
- Authors
- Zeeberg, P., Olesen, J., & Jensen, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 2006-06-27
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1894-1898
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W2979411897
- Cited by
- 153
- References
- 13
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 9.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neurology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Migraine and Headache Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Complementary and Manual Therapy › Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
- Keywords
- medication overuse headache, drug withdrawal, headache frequency, migraine, tension-type headache, drug-free period, headache diary
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Analgesics, Chronic Disease, Denmark, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Migraine Disorders, Incidence, Treatment Outcome, Risk Assessment, Withholding Treatment, Headache Disorders, Secondary
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review