Cited by 286Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlVestibular and auditory disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Delayed orthostatic hypotension: A frequent cause of orthostatic intolerance

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence, symptoms, and neurophysiologic features of delayed orthostatic hypotension (OH). METHODS: Blood pressures (BP) were measured at 1-minute intervals on 230 patients during 60 degrees head-up tilt for 45 minutes and standing for 5 minutes. OH was defined as a sustained fall in BP (>or=20 mm Hg systolic or >or=10 mm Hg diastolic) and delayed OH as a sustained BP fall occurring beyond 3 minutes of standing or upright tilt table testing. Beat-to-beat BP, tests of cardiovagal function, and sympathetic-adrenergic function were performed. RESULTS: Of patients with OH, only 46% had OH within 3 minutes of head up tilt; 15% had OH between 3 and 10 minutes; and 39% had OH only after 10 minutes of tilt table testing. The magnitude and the temporal distribution of the BP fall did not differ between those with and without symptoms of orthostatic intolerance. Patients with OH beyond 10 minutes tended to be younger (p < 0.05), have smaller BP falls during phase II of the Valsalva maneuver (p < 0.01), and have greater phase IV overshoot (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Delayed orthostatic hypotension occurred in 54% of our tested population and was associated with milder abnormalities of sympathetic adrenergic function, suggesting this disorder may be a mild or early form of sympathetic adrenergic failure.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/01.wnl.0000223828.28215.0b

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 16 · Cited by 286

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Low PA. Laboratory evaluation of autonomic function. In: Low PA ed. Clinical autonomic disorders: evaluation and management. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven 1997;179–208.
  2. Wieling W van Lieshout JJ. Maintenance of postural normotension in humans. In: Low PA ed. Clinical autonomic disorders. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Publishers 1997;73–82.

Metadata

Authors
Gibbons, C. H., & Freeman, R.
Affiliations
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
Venue
Neurology
Published
2006-07-11
Volume
67
Issue
1
Pages
28-32
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W1966982236
Cited by
286
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 16
FWCI
16.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (F32NS049899)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
Keywords
orthostatic intolerance, tilt table test, Valsalva maneuver, autonomic dysfunction
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Analysis of Variance, Blood Pressure, Blood Pressure Determination, Female, Humans, Hypotension, Orthostatic, Male, Middle Aged, Posture, Sympathetic Nervous System, Time Factors, Valsalva Maneuver, Prevalence, Linear Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review