The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Survival and mortality differences between dementia with Lewy bodies vs Alzheimer disease
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) progresses more rapidly than Alzheimer disease (AD). METHODS: We compared 315 participants (63 with DLB and 252 with AD) enrolled in a prospective longitudinal study of memory and aging with annual clinical and cognitive assessments and followed until death. The main outcome measure was dementia progression to institutionalization and death. Neuropathologic examinations were performed on all participants in this study. Subject classification (DLB vs AD) was based on neuropathology. RESULTS: Patients with DLB had an increased risk of mortality vs patients with AD (hazard ratio [HR] 1.88, 95% CI: 1.4 to 2.5). The median survival time for DLB was 78.0 years and for AD was 84.6 years (chi(2) = 19.9, p < 0.001) with significant modification effects due to gender (HR 1.51, 95% CI: 1.0 to 2.3) and the presence of at least 1 APOE epsilon4 allele (HR 1.50, 95% CI: 1.0 to 2.2). Survival after dementia onset was also different between DLB and AD (7.3 vs 8.5 years; chi(2) = 5.4, p < 0.02). DLB cases had similar risks of institutionalization and survival in long-term care facilities to AD cases. Self-reports of depression and the presence of extrapyramidal signs were important covariates. The rate of cognitive decline as measured by psychometric performance and clinical staging methods did not differ between DLB and AD. CONCLUSIONS: Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) increases the risk of mortality compared with Alzheimer disease (AD), but the two groups did not differ in rate of cognitive decline. The greater risk for noncognitive disease progression for DLB compared with AD suggests clinically meaningful differences for the two disorders.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
None of the few machine-learning studies predicting dementia patient mortality differentiated among dementia types, which remains a crucial next step for personalized treatment and management of dementia.
“Moreover, none of these studies differentiated among dementia types, which remains a crucial next step for the personalized treatment and management of dementia26,27.”
From Machine learning models identify predictive features of patient mortality across dementia types (2024) · cites this paper as [27]
In the studies identified, key distinctions were noted in cohort composition and mortality risk of Lewy body dementia vs. Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia vs. Alzheimer's disease in the context of depression, and among eight different dementia subtypes.
“In the studies that we identified, key distinctions were noted in the cohort composition and mortality risk of Lewy body dementia vs. Alzheimer’s disease27, vascular dementia vs. Alzheimer’s disease in the context of depression26, and among eight different dementia subtypes48.”
From Machine learning models identify predictive features of patient mortality across dementia types (2024) · cites this paper as [27]
The interval between initial ADD clinical diagnosis and death is approximately 8 years.
“The interval between initial ADD clinical diagnosis and death is approximately 8 years (129), but AβPs and NFTs are present well over a decade before death (130-138).”
From Correlation of Alzheimer Disease Neuropathologic Changes With Cognitive Status: A Review of the Literature (2012) · cites this paper as [129]
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 44 · Cited by 239
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Hansen LA. The Lewy body variant of Alzheimer disease. J Neural Transm (Suppl) 1997;51:83–93.
- Galvin JE. Dementia with Lewy bodies. Arch Neurol 2003;60:1332–1335.
- Rothman KJ Greenland S. Case-control studies. In: Rothman KJ Greenland S eds. Modern epidemiology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 1998:93–115.
- American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Press 1994.
- Armitage SG. An analysis of certain psychological tests used for evaluation of brain injury. Psychol Monogr 1946;60:1–48.
- McKeel DW Jr, Ball MJ, Price JL, et al. Interlaboratory histopathologic assessment of Alzheimer's neuropathology: Different methodologies yield comparable diagnostic results. Alzheimer Dis 1993;7:136–151.
Metadata
- Authors
- Williams, M. M., Xiong, C., Morris, J. C., & Galvin, J. E.
- Affiliations
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 2006-12-12
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1935-1941
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W2075907242
- Cited by
- 239
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 5.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neurology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging (AG03991, AG 05681, K08AG020764, P50AG005681, P01AG003991, AG20764)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Keywords
- dementia with Lewy bodies, Alzheimer's disease, mortality, survival, dementia progression, institutionalization, long-term care, APOE ε4, sex differences, cognitive decline, extrapyramidal signs, depression, neuropathology
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Survival Rate, Disease Progression, Lewy Body Disease
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review