The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Orthopedic outcomes of long-term daily corticosteroid treatment in Duchenne muscular dystrophy
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To document the effects of long-term daily corticosteroid treatment on a variety of orthopedic outcomes in boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. METHODS: We reviewed the charts of 159 boys with genetically confirmed dystrophinopathies followed at the Ohio State University Muscular Dystrophy Clinic between 2000 and 2003. Charts were reviewed for ambulation status, type and duration of steroid treatment (if any), and orthopedic complications including presence and location of long bone fractures, vertebral compression fractures, and the presence and degree of scoliosis. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 143 boys (16 boys with Becker dystrophy were excluded); 75 had been treated with steroids for at least 1 year, whereas 68 boys had never been treated or had received only a brief submaximal dose. The mean duration of daily steroid treatment was 8.04 years. Treated boys ambulated independently 3.3 years longer than the untreated group (p < 0.0001) and had a lower prevalence of scoliosis than the untreated group (31 vs 91%; p < 0.0001). The average scoliotic curve was also milder in the treated group (11.6 degrees) compared with the untreated group (33.2 degrees; p < 0.0001). Vertebral compression fractures occurred in 32% of the treated group, whereas no vertebral fractures were discovered in the steroid naive group (p = 0.0012). Long bone fractures were 2.6 times greater in steroid-treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: Although boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy on long-term corticosteroid treatment have a significantly decreased risk of scoliosis and an extension of more than 3 years' independent ambulation, they are at increased risk of vertebral and lower limb fractures compared with untreated boys.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bushby, K., Finkel, R., Birnkrant, D. J., Case, L. E., Clemens, P. R., Cripe, L., Kaul, A., Kinnett, K., McDonald, C., Pandya, S., et al. (2010) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(09)70271-6 · Cited by 2,053
Evidence-based path to newborn screening for Duchenne muscular dystrophy
Mendell, J. R., Shilling, C., Leslie, N. D., Flanigan, K. M., al‐Dahhak, R., Gastier‐Foster, J., Kneile, K., Dunn, D. M., Duval, B., Aoyagi, A., et al. (2012) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.23528 · Cited by 813
Self-citationCorticosteroids for the treatment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy
Matthews, E., Brassington, R., Kuntzer, T., Jichi, F., & Manzur, A. Y. (2016) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003725.pub4 · Cited by 493
The epidemiology of glucocorticoid-associated adverse events
McDonough, A. K., Curtis, J. R., & Saag, K. G. (2008) · Current Opinion in Rheumatology · doi:10.1097/bor.0b013e3282f51031 · Cited by 405
Yiu, E. M., & Kornberg, A. J. (2015) · Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health · doi:10.1111/jpc.12868 · Cited by 335
Metadata
- Authors
- King, W. M., Ruttencutter, R., Nagaraja, H. N., Matkovic, V., Landoll, J., Hoyle, C., Mendell, J. R., & Kissel, J. T.
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 2007-05-08
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 1607-1613
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W2155553758
- Cited by
- 283
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Orthopedic outcomes of long-term daily corticosteroid treatment in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/01.wnl.0000260974.41514.83
- The paper
- King, W. M., Ruttencutter, R., Nagaraja, H. N., Matkovic, V., Landoll, J., Hoyle, C., Mendell, J. R., & Kissel, J. T. (2007). Orthopedic outcomes of long-term daily corticosteroid treatment in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000260974.41514.83
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.