Longitudinal decline in autopsy-defined frontotemporal lobar degeneration
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The natural history of patients with pathologically proven frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) is important from clinical and biologic perspectives, but is not well documented quantitatively. METHODS: We examine longitudinal decline in cognitive functioning in an autopsy-proven cohort of patients with the clinical diagnosis of a FTLD spectrum disorder or FTLD pathology using a panel of neuropsychological measures. Patients are categorized according to findings at autopsy into tau-positive FTLD, tau-negative FTLD, and frontal variant-Alzheimer disease (fvAD) subgroups. RESULTS: Patients decline significantly over time on all neuropsychological measures. Moreover, several measures differentiate between histopathologically distinct subgroups throughout the course of the disease process. This includes a significant double dissociation involving relative difficulty on a visual constructional measure in tau-positive patients compared to relatively impaired visual confrontation naming in tau-negative patients. Longitudinal measures of FAS naming fluency and animal naming fluency also distinguish tau-positive patients and tau-negative patients with FTLD from patients with fvAD. Other measures show significant decline but do not distinguish between histopathologic groups longitudinally. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest different longitudinal patterns of cognitive decline in pathologically defined subgroups of patients. Measures consistently distinguishing between patient subgroups can be used to bolster diagnostic accuracy throughout the course of these diseases, while measures demonstrating undifferentiated longitudinal decline may serve as useful endpoints in treatment trials.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Pathology-specific profiles point to impaired visual construction in tau-positive FTLD and confrontation naming in tau-negative FTLD, and linguistic deficits in FTLD-TDP.
“Pathology-specific profiles point to impaired visual construction in tau-positive FTLD and confrontation naming in tau-negative FTLD, and linguistic deficits in FTLD-TDP (Grossman et al., 2008; Kawakami et al., 2021).”
From The pursuit for markers of disease progression in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia: a scoping review to optimize outcome measures for clinical trials (2024) · cites this paper as Grossman et al., 2008
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 43 · Cited by 77
- Authors
- Grossman, M., Xie, S. X., Libon, D. J., Wang, X., Massimo, L., Moore, P., Vesely, L., Berkowitz, R., Chatterjee, A., Coslett, H. B., Hurtig, H. I., Forman, M. S., Lee, V. M.-Y., & Trojanowski, J. Q.
- Affiliations
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 2008-05-27
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 2036-2045
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- PMC
- PMC2736475
- OpenAlex
- W2123083259
- Cited by
- 77
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 5.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Neurology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging (AG15116, P30AG010124, R01AG015116, P01AG017586, AG17586, AG-10124, AG 44266)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (P50NS053488, R01NS044266)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
- Keywords
- frontotemporal lobar degeneration, natural history (disease), cognitive decline, neuropsychological measures, double dissociation, confrontation naming, treatment endpoints
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Autopsy, Dementia, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Cohort Studies, Disease Progression
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review