Cited by 553Cerebrovascular and genetic disordersHereditary Neurological DisordersMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies

Invited article: an MRI-based approach to the diagnosis of white matter disorders

Open access
Schiffmann, Raphael, van der Knaap, Marjo S.·2009·Neurology

Abstract

Background There are many different white matter disorders, both inherited and acquired, and consequently the diagnostic process is difficult. Establishing a specific diagnosis is often delayed at great emotional and financial costs. The pattern of brain structures involved, as visualized by MRI, has proven to often have a high diagnostic specificity. Methods We developed a comprehensive practical algorithm that relies mainly on the characteristics of brain MRI. Results The initial decision point defines a hypomyelination pattern, in which the cerebral white matter is hyperintense (normal), isointense, or slightly hypointense relative to the cortex on T1-weighted images, vs other pathologies with more prominent hypointensity of the cerebral white matter on T1-weighted images. In all types of pathology, the affected white matter is hyperintense on T2-weighted images, but, as a rule, the T2 hyperintensity is less marked in hypomyelination than in other pathologies. Some hypomyelinating disorders are typically associated with peripheral nerve involvement, while others are not. Lesions in patients with pathologies other than hypomyelination can be either confluent or isolated and multifocal. Among the diseases with confluent lesions, the distribution of the abnormalities is of high diagnostic value. Additional MRI features, such as white matter rarefaction, the presence of cysts, contrast enhancement, and the presence of calcifications, further narrow the diagnostic possibilities…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/01.wnl.0000343049.00540.c8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schiffmann, R., & van der Knaap, M. S.
Affiliations
  • Baylor University Medical Center (US)
  • From the Institute of Metabolic Disease (R.S.), Baylor Research Institute, Dallas, TX; and Department of Child Neurology (M.S.v.d.K.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Venue
Neurology
Published
2009-02-24
Volume
72
Issue
8
Pages
750-759
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2108583379
Cited by
553
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 43
FWCI
19.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Cerebrovascular and genetic disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Hereditary Neurological Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Keywords
white matter disease, hypomyelination, white matter hyperintensities, T1-weighted imaging, T2-weighted imaging, white matter rarefaction, peripheral nerve involvement, diagnostic algorithm, decision tree, leukodystrophy, cysts, calcification, contrast enhancement
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Brain, Brain Diseases, Cerebral Cortex, Decision Trees, Demyelinating Diseases, Diagnosis, Differential, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review