Cited by 108Tuberous Sclerosis Complex ResearchEpilepsy research and treatmentPharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies

Everolimus for treatment-refractory seizures in TSC: Extension of a randomized controlled trial

Open access
Franz, David N., Lawson, John A., Yapici, Zuhal, Ikeda, Hiroko, Polster, Tilman, Nabbout, Rima, Curatolo, Paolo, de Vries, Petrus J. +110 more·2018·Neurology Clinical Practice

Abstract

BACKGROUND: EXamining everolimus In a Study of Tuberous sclerosis 3 (EXIST-3) demonstrated significantly reduced seizure frequency (SF) with everolimus vs placebo. In this study, we evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of everolimus for tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC)-associated treatment-refractory seizures. METHODS: After completion of the core phase, patients could enter an open-label extension phase and receive everolimus (target exposure, 3-15 ng/mL) for ≥48 weeks. Efficacy end points included change from baseline in average weekly SF expressed as response rate (RR, ≥50% reduction) and median percentage reduction (PR). RESULTS: Of 366 patients, 361 received everolimus in core/extension phases. The RR was 31% (95% CI, 26.2-36.1; N = 352) at week 18, 46.6% (95% CI, 40.9-52.5; N = 298) at 1 year, and 57.7% (95% CI, 49.7-65.4; N = 163) at 2 years. Median PR in SF was 31.7% (95% CI, 28.5-36.1) at week 18, 46.7% (95% CI, 40.2-54) at 1 year, and 56.9% (95% CI, 50-68.4) at 2 years. Ninety-five patients (26.3%) discontinued everolimus before 2 years; 103 (28.5%) had <2 years of follow-up at study cutoff, and 40% were exposed to everolimus for ≥2 years. An analysis classifying discontinued patients as nonresponders showed an RR of 30.2% (95% CI, 25.5-35.2; N = 361) at week 18, 38.8% (95% CI, 33.7-44.1; N = 358) at 1 year, and 41% (95% CI, 34.6-47.7; N = 229) at 2 years, suggesting sustained benefit over time. The incidence of grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) (any cause) was 40.2%, and 13% discontinued because of AEs (pneumonia [1.7%] and stomatitis [1.4%]). Two deaths were suspected to be treatment-related (pneumonia and septic shock). CONCLUSIONS: Sustained reductions in TSC-associated treatment-refractory seizures over time were achieved with adjunctive everolimus. The safety profile was consistent with the core phase with no new safety concerns. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class IV evidence that long-term everolimus therapy reduces SF in patients with TSC-associated treatment-refractory seizures.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/cpj.0000000000000514

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In contrast to most RCTs, the clinical response increased over time as measured in the open-label extension study of patients on everolimus for ≥48 weeks, postulated to be due to a disease-modifying effect.

    “In contrast to most RCTs, the clinical response increased over time as measured in the open-label extension study of patients on everolimus for ≥48 weeks, postulated to be due to a disease-modifying effect 204 .”

    From Developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (2024) · cites this paper as [204]

    The Results report that response rates increased from 31% at week 18 to 46.6% at one year and 57.7% at two years. The introduction says seizure improvement might increase over time because everolimus addresses the underlying pathophysiology of TSC, and states that all patients had completed at least 48 weeks of the extension phase. Our copy does not establish the comparison with most RCTs. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 16 · Cited by 108

Authors
Franz, D. N., Lawson, J. A., Yapici, Z., Ikeda, H., Polster, T., Nabbout, R., Curatolo, P., de Vries, P. J., Dlugos, D. J., Voi, M., Fan, J., Vaury, A., Pelov, D., French, J. A., Schteinschnaider, A., Sfaello, I., Lawson, J., Nagarajan, L., Harvey, S., Verhelst, H., De Waele, L., Van Bogaert, P., El Tahry, R., Jansen, A., Connolly, M., Major, P., Velez, A., Carreno, O., Gomez, J., Christensen, J., Vallee, L., The Tich, S. N., Milh, M., De Saint Martin, A., Berquin, P., Ville, D., Wiemer-Kruel, A., Hertzberg, C., Wiegand, G., Polster, T., Papavasiliou, A., Tzoufi, M., Fogarasi, A., Gyorsok, Z., Dioszeghy, P., Webb, D. W., Bartalini, G., Gobbi, G., Canevini, M. P., Veggiotti, P., Baglietto, M. G., Giallonardo, A. T., Laforgia, N., Falsaperla, R., Ikeda, H., Nabatame, S., Kawawaki, H., Yoshinaga, H., Kubota, M., Suzuki, Y., Moreno, H. C., Zonnenberg, B., de Wit, M. C. Y., Majoie, M., Bjoernvold, M., Jozwiak, S., Kim, K., Kim, H. D., Lee, M., Ko, T., Belousova, E., Ermolenko, N., Poverennova, I., Kuzenkova, L., Ruiz Falco Rojas, M. L., Lopez de Munain, A., Uranga, J. R., Villanueva, V., Fan, P.-C., Huang, C.-C., Chang, Y.-C., Nabangchang, C., Chomtho, K., Likasitwattanakul, S., Thampratankul, L., Yapici, Z., Serdaroglu, A., Ahlar, B., Aylett, S., Desurkar, A., Johnston, C., Koepp, M., Cock, H., Parker, A., McCorry, D., Appleton, R., Sparagana, S., Taub, K., Frost, M., Roberts, C., Sahin, M., Koh, S., Koenig, M., Bebin, M., Miles, D., Franz, D., Wheless, J., Wilfong, A., Gipson, T., Wu, J., Kuperman, R., Zupanc, M., Kohrman, M., DiMario, F., Wong, M., Trauner, D., Mahalingam, R., & Narayanan, V.
Affiliations
  • Department of Neurology (DNF), Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, OH; Tuberous Sclerosis Multidisciplinary Management Clinic (JAL), Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia; Division of Child Neurology (ZY), Department of Neurology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Turkey; NHO Epilepsy Center (HI), Shizuoka Institute of Epilepsy and Neurological Disorders, Japan; Paediatric Epileptology (TP), Mara Hospital, Bethel Epilepsy Center, Germany;...
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
Venue
Neurology Clinical Practice
Published
2018-10
Volume
8
Issue
5
Pages
412-420
ISSN
  • 2163-0402 (ISSN-L)
  • 2163-0933
OpenAlex
W2894432237
Cited by
108
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 9
FWCI
10.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Neurology Clinical Practice (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Cineca Institutional Research Information System (Tor Vergata University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies
Keywords
everolimus, tuberous sclerosis complex, seizure frequency reduction, long-term efficacy, drug safety, mTOR inhibition, open-label extension

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review