Cited by 18Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Rare ABCA7 variants in 2 German families with Alzheimer disease

Open access

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to identify variants associated with familial late-onset Alzheimer disease (AD) using whole-genome sequencing. Methods Several families with an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern of AD were analyzed by whole-genome sequencing. Variants were prioritized for rare, likely pathogenic variants in genes already known to be associated with AD and confirmed by Sanger sequencing using standard protocols. Results We identified 2 rare ABCA7 variants (rs143718918 and rs538591288) with varying penetrance in 2 independent German AD families, respectively. The single nucleotide variant (SNV) rs143718918 causes a missense mutation, and the deletion rs538591288 causes a frameshift mutation of ABCA7. Both variants have previously been reported in larger cohorts but with incomplete segregation information. ABCA7 is one of more than 20 AD risk loci that have so far been identified by genome-wide association studies, and both common and rare variants of ABCA7 have previously been described in different populations with higher frequencies in AD cases than in controls and varying penetrance. Furthermore, ABCA7 is known to be involved in several AD-relevant pathways. Conclusions We conclude that both SNVs might contribute to the development of AD in the examined family members. Together with previous findings, our data confirm ABCA7 as one of the most relevant AD risk genes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/nxg.0000000000000224

Cites

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Pedigree charts The age at examination of each individual sequenced in this study is given beneath the identifier number. Individuals diagnosed with AD are indicated as affected (dark gray), individuals with AD-like symptoms reported by their family members are indicated in light gray. (A) Pedigree of family 1. The genotypes are wild type (G/G) or the alteration (G/A) that causes the ABCA7 missense mutation. (B) Pedigree of family 2. The genotypes are wild type (T/T) or the alteration (T/del) that causes the ABCA7 frameshift mutation.
Figure 1 Pedigree charts The age at examination of each individual sequenced in this study is given beneath the identifier number. Individuals diagnosed with AD are indicated as affected (dark gray), individuals with AD-like symptoms reported by their family members are indicated in light gray. (A) Pedigree of family 1. The genotypes are wild type (G/G) or the alteration (G/A) that causes the ABCA7 missense mutation. (B) Pedigree of family 2. The genotypes are wild type (T/T) or the alteration (T/del) that causes the ABCA7 frameshift mutation.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Linkage analysis of chromosome 19 (A) The maximum LOD score (1.8) over the whole chromosome is seen in the region containing ABCA7. (B) Linkage analysis of the ABCA7 region on chromosome 19. The maximal LOD score (1.8) could be found on chromosome 19 in the region from 257,507 to 3,909,104 suggesting linkage, the region in red spans the gene ABCA7. Of the combined LOD score of 1.8 in the region spanning ABCA7, family 1 and family 2 contributed LOD scores of 1.2 and 0.6, respectively.
Figure 2 Linkage analysis of chromosome 19 (A) The maximum LOD score (1.8) over the whole chromosome is seen in the region containing ABCA7. (B) Linkage analysis of the ABCA7 region on chromosome 19. The maximal LOD score (1.8) could be found on chromosome 19 in the region from 257,507 to 3,909,104 suggesting linkage, the region in red spans the gene ABCA7. Of the combined LOD score of 1.8 in the region spanning ABCA7, family 1 and family 2 contributed LOD scores of 1.2 and 0.6, respectively.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Segregating haplotype blocks The affected, unaffected, and disease status of unknown individuals are filled in black, white, and gray, respectively. An asterisk indicates the individuals who were not sequenced and their haplotypes were inferred. (A) The disease haplotype is indicated in purple. (B) The disease haplotype is indicated in light green. In both families, cosegregation of the disease haplotype including the corresponding ABCA7 variant can be seen in all affected individuals.
Figure 3 Segregating haplotype blocks The affected, unaffected, and disease status of unknown individuals are filled in black, white, and gray, respectively. An asterisk indicates the individuals who were not sequenced and their haplotypes were inferred. (A) The disease haplotype is indicated in purple. (B) The disease haplotype is indicated in light green. In both families, cosegregation of the disease haplotype including the corresponding ABCA7 variant can be seen in all affected individuals.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 33 · Cited by 18

Metadata

Authors
May, P., Pichler, S., Hartl, D., Bobbili, D. R., Mayhaus, M., Spaniol, C., Kurz, A., Balling, R., Schneider, J. G., & Riemenschneider, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Luxembourg (LU)
  • From the Luxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine (LCSB) (P.M., D.R.B., R.B., J.G.S.), University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (S.P., D.H., M.M., C.S., M.R.), Saarland University Hospital, Saarland University, Homburg; and Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (A.K.), Klinikum Rechts der Isar, TU-Muenchen, Munich, Germany.
Corresponding author
Pichler, Sabrina
Venue
Neurology Genetics
Published
2018-04
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
e224-e224
ISSN
2376-7839 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2790576634
Cited by
18
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Neurology Genetics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Luxembourg) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
  • Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS
  • Universität des Saarlandes
  • Novo Nordisk Fonden
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
ABCA7, Alzheimer's disease, late-onset Alzheimer's disease, familial Alzheimer's disease, rare variants, autosomal dominant inheritance, missense mutations, frameshift deletion, genetic susceptibility loci, penetrance, German families

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rare ABCA7 variants in 2 German families with Alzheimer disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/nxg.0000000000000224
The paper
May, P., Pichler, S., Hartl, D., Bobbili, D. R., Mayhaus, M., Spaniol, C., Kurz, A., Balling, R., Schneider, J. G., & Riemenschneider, M. (2018). Rare ABCA7 variants in 2 German families with Alzheimer disease. Neurology Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1212/nxg.0000000000000224