Cited by 343Epilepsy research and treatmentClinical practice guidelines implementationPharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Evidence-based guideline: Management of an unprovoked first seizure in adults: Report of the Guideline Development Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the American Epilepsy Society

Open access

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To provide evidence-based recommendations for treatment of adults with an unprovoked first seizure. METHODS: We defined relevant questions and systematically reviewed published studies according to the American Academy of Neurology's classification of evidence criteria; we based recommendations on evidence level. RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Adults with an unprovoked first seizure should be informed that their seizure recurrence risk is greatest early within the first 2 years (21%-45%) (Level A), and clinical variables associated with increased risk may include a prior brain insult (Level A), an EEG with epileptiform abnormalities (Level A), a significant brain-imaging abnormality (Level B), and a nocturnal seizure (Level B). Immediate antiepileptic drug (AED) therapy, as compared with delay of treatment pending a second seizure, is likely to reduce recurrence risk within the first 2 years (Level B) but may not improve quality of life (Level C). Over a longer term (>3 years), immediate AED treatment is unlikely to improve prognosis as measured by sustained seizure remission (Level B). Patients should be advised that risk of AED adverse events (AEs) may range from 7% to 31% (Level B) and that these AEs are likely predominantly mild and reversible. Clinicians' recommendations whether to initiate immediate AED treatment after a first seizure should be based on individualized assessments that weigh the risk of recurrence against the AEs of AED therapy, consider educated patient preferences, and advise that immediate treatment will not improve the long-term prognosis for seizure remission but will reduce seizure risk over the subsequent 2 years.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.0000000000001487

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 47 · Cited by 343

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. American Academy of Neurology. Clinical Practice Guideline Process Manual, 2004 ed. St. Paul, MN: American Academy of Neurology; 2004.
  2. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). Management of Newly Diagnosed Patients with Epilepsy: A Systematic Review of the Literature (AHRQ Publication No. 01-E038). Rockville, MD: Agency for Health Research Quality, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2001.

Metadata

Authors
Krumholz, A., Wiebe, S., Gronseth, G. S., Gloss, D. S., Sanchez, A. M., Kabir, A. A., Liferidge, A. T., Martello, J. P., Kanner, A. M., Shinnar, S., Hopp, J. L., & French, J. A.
Affiliations
  • Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
  • From the Department of Neurology, Maryland Epilepsy Center (A.K.), and Department of Neurology (A.M.S., A.A.K., J.P.M., J.L.H.), University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore; US Department of Veterans Affairs (A.K.), Maryland Healthcare System, Epilepsy Center of Excellence, Baltimore, MD; Department of Clinical Neuroscience (S.W.), University of Calgary Faculty of Medicine, Canada; Department of Neurology (G.S.G.), University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS; Department of...
Venue
Neurology
Published
2015-04-21
Volume
84
Issue
16
Pages
1705-1713
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2126862623
Cited by
343
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 11
FWCI
29.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Citizens United for Research in Epilepsy
  • Pfizer
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • American Academy of Neurology
  • University of Calgary
  • Sunovion
  • Acorda Therapeutics
  • Supernus Pharmaceuticals
  • SK Life Science
  • Upsher-Smith
  • York University
  • Eisai
  • H. Lundbeck A/S
  • Epilepsiatutkimussäätiö
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
  • UCB Pharma
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies
Keywords
adults, seizure recurrence risk, antiepileptic drugs, seizure remission, adverse drug reactions, recurrence risk factors, patient preferences, quality of life
MeSH terms
Adult, Anticonvulsants, Humans, Risk, Seizures, Societies, Medical, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Evidence-Based Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review