Cited by 67Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and ComplicationsIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ResearchCerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Spotlight on the January 5 Issue

Gross, Robert A.·2016·Neurology

Abstract

PET to determine cutpoints for CSF markers.Another featured article compares time trends in causes of in-hospital death after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.0000000000002233

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 67

Metadata

Authors
Gross, R. A.
Corresponding author
Gross, Robert A.
Venue
Neurology
Published
2016-01-05
Volume
86
Issue
1
Pages
1-1
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2402524528
Cited by
67
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 17
FWCI
9.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Neurology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
Keywords
cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, positron emission tomography, cut-off values, aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, in-hospital mortality, temporal trends

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review