The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Relation of genomic variants for Alzheimer disease dementia to common neuropathologies
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the associations of previously reported Alzheimer disease (AD) dementia genomic variants with common neuropathologies. METHODS: This is a postmortem study including 1,017 autopsied participants from 2 clinicopathologic cohorts. Analyses focused on 22 genomic variants associated with AD dementia in large-scale case-control genome-wide association study (GWAS) meta-analyses. The neuropathologic traits of interest were a pathologic diagnosis of AD according to NIA-Reagan criteria, macroscopic and microscopic infarcts, Lewy bodies (LB), and hippocampal sclerosis. For each variant, multiple logistic regression was used to investigate its association with neuropathologic traits, adjusting for age, sex, and subpopulation structure. We also conducted power analyses to estimate the sample sizes required to detect genome-wide significance (p < 5 × 10(-8)) for pathologic AD for all variants. RESULTS: APOE ε4 allele was associated with greater odds of pathologic AD (odds ratio [OR] 3.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.67-5.46, p = 1.9 × 10(-13)), while ε2 allele was associated with lower odds of pathologic AD (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.30-0.61, p = 3.1 × 10(-6)). Four additional genomic variants including rs6656401 (CR1), rs1476679 (ZCWPW1), rs35349669 (INPP5D), and rs17125944 (FERMT2) had p values less than 0.05. Remarkably, half of the previously reported AD dementia variants are not likely to be detected for association with pathologic AD with a sample size in excess of the largest GWAS meta-analyses of AD dementia. CONCLUSIONS: Many recently discovered genomic variants for AD dementia are not associated with the pathology of AD. Some genomic variants for AD dementia appear to be associated with other common neuropathologies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“which, in earlier studies, displayed very little or no association with neuropathologic features of AD30,31.”
From A molecular network of the aging human brain provides insights into the pathology and cognitive decline of Alzheimer’s disease (2018) · cites this paper as [30]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 43 · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- Farfel, J. M., Yu, L., Buchman, A. S., Schneider, J. A., De Jager, P. L., & Bennett, D. A.
- Affiliations
- From the Department of Geriatrics (J.M.F.), University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Brazil; Department of Pathology (J.M.F., J.A.S.), Rush Alzheimer's Disease Center (J.M.F., L.Y., A.S.B., J.A.S., D.A.B.), and Department of Neurological Sciences (L.Y., A.S.B., J.A.S., D.A.B.), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Program in Translational NeuroPsychiatric Genomics (P.L.D.), Institute for the Neurosciences, Departments of Neurology and Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston; Harvard...
- Broad Institute (US)
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 2016-08-02
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 489-496
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- PMC
- PMC4970661
- OpenAlex
- W2470626250
- Cited by
- 64
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3
- FWCI
- 8.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Neurology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging (R01AG017917, R01AG042210, U01AG046152, R01AG015819, P30AG010161, RF1AG015819)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Keywords
- Alzheimer's disease, dementia, genetic variants, neuropathology, APOE ε4, APOE ε2, complement receptor 1, INPP5D, FERMT2, cerebral infarction, Lewy bodies, hippocampal sclerosis, sample size determination, genetic association
- MeSH terms
- Phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-Trisphosphate 5-Phosphatases, Aged, 80 and over, Alleles, Alzheimer Disease, Apolipoproteins E, Cerebral Infarction, Female, Hippocampus, Humans, Male, Membrane Proteins, Neoplasm Proteins, Genetic Variation, Genome, Human, Logistic Models, Zinc Fingers, Lewy Bodies, Receptors, Complement 3b, Genome-Wide Association Study
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review