Cited by 106Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Temporal T807 binding correlates with CSF tau and phospho-tau in normal elderly

Open access

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To better understand cross-sectional relationships between CSF and PET measures of tau pathology, we compared regional and global measures of (18)F-T807 (AV-1451) PET to CSF protein levels of total tau (t-tau), phosphorylated tau (p-tau), and β-amyloid 1-42 (Aβ42). METHODS: T-tau, p-tau, and Aβ42 levels were assessed using INNOTEST xMAP immunoassays. Linear regression was used to compare regional and global measures of (18)F-T807 standardized uptake value ratios (SUVR) to CSF protein levels using data from 31 cognitively unimpaired elderly participants in the Harvard Aging Brain study. RESULTS: After controlling for sex and age, total cortical (18)F-T807 binding was significantly correlated with p-tau (partial r = 0.48; p < 0.01) and at trend level with t-tau (partial r = 0.30; p = 0.12). Regional (18)F-T807 measures were more strongly correlated with CSF protein levels than the global measure, with both t-tau and p-tau significantly correlated with (18)F-T807 SUVR in entorhinal, parahippocampal, and inferior temporal cortical regions (partial r = 0.53-0.73). Peak correlations between CSF and PET measures of tau were similar to those between CSF and PET measures of amyloid burden. Finally, we observed significantly higher temporal T807 SUVR in individuals with high amyloid burden. CONCLUSIONS: These data support the link between (18)F-T807 PET and CSF measures of tau pathology. In these cognitively normal individuals with (18)F-T807 binding largely restricted to the temporal lobe, (18)F-T807 SUVR in temporal regions appeared more reflective of CSF t-tau and p-tau than a total cortical measure.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.0000000000003050

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 28 · Cited by 106

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Weschler D. WMS-R: Weschler Memory Scale-Revised Manual. New York: Psychological Corporation/HBJ; 1987.

Metadata

Authors
Chhatwal, J. P., Schultz, A. P., Marshall, G. A., Boot, B., Gomez-Isla, T., Dumurgier, J., LaPoint, M., Scherzer, C., Roe, A. D., Hyman, B. T., Sperling, R. A., & Johnson, K. A.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • From Harvard Medical School (J.P.C., A.P.S., G.A.M., B.B., T.G.-I., C.S., B.T.H., R.A.S., K.A.J.); Massachusetts General Hospital (J.P.C., A.P.S., G.A.M., B.B., T.G.-I., J.D., M.L., A.D.R., B.T.H., R.A.S., K.A.J.), Boston; Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging (J.P.C., A.P.S., M.L., R.A.S., K.A.J.), Charlestown; Brigham and Women's Hospital (G.A.M., B.B., C.S., R.A.S., K.A.J.), Boston; Biogen (B.B.), Cambridge, MA; Lariboisiere Hospital Memory Center (J.D.), APHP, University Paris 7 Denis Diderot,...
Venue
Neurology
Published
2016-08-30
Volume
87
Issue
9
Pages
920-926
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2488836793
Cited by
106
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 4
FWCI
15.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5u01ag024904-10, UL1TR000170, UL1TR001102)
  • National Institute on Aging (U01-AG-024904, K23AG049087, K24AG035007, R01AG046396, U19AG010483, P01AG036694)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (U01NS082157)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Keywords
tau PET, cerebrospinal fluid tau, phosphorylated tau, total tau, amyloid PET, amyloid-beta 42, temporal lobe, entorhinal cortex, parahippocampal cortex, inferior temporal cortex, Alzheimer's disease biomarkers
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Brain, Carbolines, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Mental Status Schedule, Phosphorylation, Temporal Lobe, Geriatric Assessment, Amyloid beta-Peptides, tau Proteins, Positron-Emission Tomography, Apolipoprotein E4

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review