The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Long-term follow-up of psychogenic pseudosyncope
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the outcome of patients with psychogenic pseudosyncope (PPS) after communication of the diagnosis. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with PPS referred in 2007 to 2015 to a tertiary referral center for syncope. We reviewed patient records and studied attack frequency, factors affecting attack frequency, health care use, and quality of life using a questionnaire. We explored influences on attack freedom and attack frequency in the 6 months before follow-up for age, sex, education level, duration until diagnosis, probability of diagnosis, additional syncope, and acceptance of diagnosis. RESULTS: Forty-seven of 57 patients with PPS could be traced, of whom 35 (74%) participated. Twelve (34%) were attack-free for at least 6 months. The median time from diagnosis to follow-up was 50 months (range 6-103 months). Communicating and explaining the diagnosis resulted in immediate reduction of attack frequency (p = 0.007) from the month before diagnosis (median one attack, range 0-156) to the month after (median one attack, range 0-16). In the 6 months before follow-up, the number of admissions decreased from 19 of 35 to 0 of 35 (p = 0.002). The use of somatic and mental health care shifted toward the latter (p < 0.0001). Quality of life at follow-up (Short Form Health Survey 36) showed lower scores for 7 of 8 domains compared to matched Dutch control values; quality of life was not influenced by attack freedom. CONCLUSIONS: After communication of the diagnosis in PPS, attack frequency decreased and health care use shifted toward mental care. Low quality of life underlines that PPS is a serious condition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In one observational study, 405 communicating and explaining the diagnosis resulted in an immediate reduction of attack frequency, with 39% of patients being asymptomatic during a mean follow-up period of 4 years.”
From 2018 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope (2018) · cites this paper as [405]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 29 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Saal, D. P., Overdijk, M. J., Thijs, R. D., van Vliet, I. M., & van Dijk, J. G.
- Affiliations
- Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
- From the Departments of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology (D.P.S., J.G.v.D.) and Psychiatry (I.M.v.V.), Leiden University Medical Center; Department of Neurology (M.J.O.), Medical Center Haaglanden, The Hague; and Stichting Epilepsie Instellingen Nederland (R.D.T.), Heemstede, the Netherlands.
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 2016-11-22
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 2214-2219
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- PMC
- PMC5123560
- OpenAlex
- W2543521313
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 4.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Neurology (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- diagnosis disclosure, attack frequency, health care utilization, mental health services, quality of life, long-term outcomes, syncope, diagnosis acceptance
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychophysiologic Disorders, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Retrospective Studies, Socioeconomic Factors, Syncope, Databases, Factual, Young Adult, Tertiary Care Centers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review