Cited by 98Machine Learning in HealthcareIntracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and ComplicationsBiomedical Text Mining and Ontologies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Large-scale identification of patients with cerebral aneurysms using natural language processing

Open access

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To use natural language processing (NLP) in conjunction with the electronic medical record (EMR) to accurately identify patients with cerebral aneurysms and their matched controls. METHODS: ICD-9 and Current Procedural Terminology codes were used to obtain an initial data mart of potential aneurysm patients from the EMR. NLP was then used to train a classification algorithm with .632 bootstrap cross-validation used for correction of overfitting bias. The classification rule was then applied to the full data mart. Additional validation was performed on 300 patients classified as having aneurysms. Controls were obtained by matching age, sex, race, and healthcare use. RESULTS: We identified 55,675 patients of 4.2 million patients with ICD-9 and Current Procedural Terminology codes consistent with cerebral aneurysms. Of those, 16,823 patients had the term aneurysm occur near relevant anatomic terms. After training, a final algorithm consisting of 8 coded and 14 NLP variables was selected, yielding an overall area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.95. After the final algorithm was applied, 5,589 patients were classified as having aneurysms, and 54,952 controls were matched to those patients. The positive predictive value based on a validation cohort of 300 patients was 0.86. CONCLUSIONS: We harnessed the power of the EMR by applying NLP to obtain a large cohort of patients with intracranial aneurysms and their matched controls. Such algorithms can be generalized to other diseases for epidemiologic and genetic studies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.0000000000003490

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 18 · Cited by 98

Metadata

Authors
Castro, V. M., Dligach, D., Finan, S., Yu, S., Can, A., Abd-El-Barr, M., Gainer, V., Shadick, N. A., Murphy, S., Cai, T., Savova, G., Weiss, S. T., & Du, R.
Affiliations
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
  • From Research Information Systems and Computing (V.M.C., V.G., S.M.), Partners Healthcare; Boston Children's Hospital Informatics Program (D.D., S.F., G.S.); Harvard Medical School (D.D., S.Y., A.C., M.A.-E.-B., N.A.S., S.M., S.T.W., R.D.); Department of Medicine (S.Y., S.T.W.), Department of Neurosurgery (A.C., M.A.-E.-B., R.D.), Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy (N.A.S.), and Channing Division of Network Medicine (S.T.W., R.D.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Center for...
Venue
Neurology
Published
2017-01-10
Volume
88
Issue
2
Pages
164-168
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2560569441
Cited by
98
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 13
FWCI
9.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Human Genome Research Institute (U54HG007963)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
Keywords
intracranial aneurysm, natural language processing, electronic health records, patient identification, matched controls, ICD-9 codes, CPT codes, machine learning classifiers, positive predictive value
MeSH terms
Aged, Algorithms, Intracranial Aneurysm, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Natural Language Processing, Retrospective Studies, Case-Control Studies, Area Under Curve, International Classification of Diseases, Electronic Health Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review