Cited by 252Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNutritional Studies and DietPhytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities

Nutrients and bioactives in green leafy vegetables and cognitive decline: Prospective study

Open access
Morris, Martha Clare, Wang, Yamin, Barnes, Lisa L., Bennett, David A., Dawson-Hughes, Bess, Booth, Sarah L.·2018·Neurology

Abstract

Objective To increase understanding of the biological mechanisms underlying the association, we investigated the individual relations to cognitive decline of the primary nutrients and bioactives in green leafy vegetables, including vitamin K (phylloquinone), lutein, β-carotene, nitrate, folate, kaempferol, and α-tocopherol. Methods This was a prospective study of 960 participants of the Memory and Aging Project, ages 58–99 years, who completed a food frequency questionnaire and had ≥2 cognitive assessments over a mean 4.7 years. Results In a linear mixed model adjusted for age, sex, education, participation in cognitive activities, physical activities, smoking, and seafood and alcohol consumption, consumption of green leafy vegetables was associated with slower cognitive decline; the decline rate for those in the highest quintile of intake (median 1.3 servings/d) was slower by β = 0.05 standardized units (p = 0.0001) or the equivalent of being 11 years younger in age. Higher intakes of each of the nutrients and bioactives except β-carotene were individually associated with slower cognitive decline. In the adjusted models, the rates for the highest vs the lowest quintiles of intake were β = 0.02, p = 0.002 for phylloquinone; β = 0.04, p = 0.002 for lutein; β = 0.05, p < 0.001 for folate; β = 0.03, p = 0.02 for α-tocopherol; β = 0.04, p = 0.002 for nitrate; β = 0.04, p = 0.003 for kaempferol; and β = 0.02, p = 0.08 for β-carotene. Conclusions Consumption of approximately 1 serving per day of green leafy vegetables and foods rich in phylloquinone, lutein, nitrate, folate, α-tocopherol, and kaempferol may help to slow cognitive decline with aging.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.0000000000004815

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A longitudinal cohort study found that the highest intake of green leafy vegetables was associated with less cognitive decline over 4.7 years than the lowest intake.

    “One example is a longitudinal cohort study of 960 participants, ages 58–99 years, in which those reporting the highest intake of green leafy vegetables, equivalent to 1·3 servings per day, had less cognitive decline over 4·7 years than those reporting the lowest intake (β=0·05 standardised units 95% CI 0·02–0·07).”

    From Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2020 report of the Lancet Commission (2020) · cites this paper as [146]

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The authors reported this difference as equivalent to being 11 years younger.

    “The authors report this difference as being equivalent to being 11 years younger.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 40 · Cited by 252

Authors
Morris, M. C., Wang, Y., Barnes, L. L., Bennett, D. A., Dawson-Hughes, B., & Booth, S. L.
Affiliations
  • Tufts University (US)
  • From the Departments of Internal Medicine (M.C.M., Y.W.), Preventive Medicine (Y.W.), Behavioral Sciences (L.L.B.), and Neurological Sciences (L.L.B., D.A.B.), and Rush Alzheimer Disease Center (L.L.B., D.A.B.), Rush University, Chicago, IL; and Tufts Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging (B.D.-H., S.L.B.), Tufts University, Boston, MA.
Venue
Neurology
Published
2018-01-16
Volume
90
Issue
3
Pages
e214-e222
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2780998634
Cited by
252
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 14
FWCI
12.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (R01AG017917, R01AG054476)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
Keywords
leafy vegetables, cognitive decline, vitamin K1, vitamin K, lutein, beta-carotene, nitrate, folic acid, kaempferol, alpha-tocopherol, dietary bioactive compounds, aging, dietary intake
MeSH terms
Diet, Healthy, Nutrients, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Smoking, Vegetables, Exercise, Disease Progression, Plant Leaves, Cognitive Dysfunction, Phytochemicals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review