Cited by 26Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchFace Recognition and Perception

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Neural effects of oxytocin and mimicry in frontotemporal dementia: A randomized crossover study

Open access

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether intranasal oxytocin, alone or in combination with instructed mimicry of facial expressions, would augment neural activity in patients with frontotemporal dementia (FTD) in brain regions associated with empathy, emotion processing, and the simulation network, as indexed by blood oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) signal during fMRI. METHODS: In a placebo-controlled, randomized crossover design, 28 patients with FTD received 72 IU intranasal oxytocin or placebo and then completed an fMRI facial expression mimicry task. RESULTS: Oxytocin alone and in combination with instructed mimicry increased activity in regions of the simulation network and in limbic regions associated with emotional expression processing. CONCLUSIONS: The findings demonstrate latent capacity to augment neural activity in affected limbic and other frontal and temporal regions during social cognition in patients with FTD, and support the promise and need for further investigation of these interventions as therapeutics in FTD. CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER: NCT01937013. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that a single dose of 72 IU intranasal oxytocin augments BOLD signal in patients with FTD during viewing of emotional facial expressions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.0000000000010933

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 56 · Cited by 26

Metadata

Authors
Oliver, L. D., Stewart, C., Coleman, K., Kryklywy, J. H., Bartha, R., Mitchell, D. G. V., & Finger, E. C.
Affiliations
Western University (CA)
Venue
Neurology
Published
2020-11-10
Volume
95
Issue
19
Pages
e2635-e2647
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W3089151448
Cited by
26
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
4.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Scholarship@Western (Western University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (286763)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
oxytocin, frontotemporal dementia, facial mimicry, social cognition, empathy, emotional processing, limbic system, intranasal administration, neuronal activity
MeSH terms
Administration, Intranasal, Aged, Brain, Emotions, Empathy, Facial Expression, Female, Humans, Imitative Behavior, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Oxytocics, Oxytocin, Cross-Over Studies, Frontotemporal Dementia, Functional Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review