Cited by 35Epilepsy research and treatmentGenomics and Rare DiseasesCancer Genomics and Diagnostics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Somatic Mosaic Pathogenic Variant Gradient Detected in Trace Brain Tissue From Stereo-EEG Depth Electrodes

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Mosaic pathogenic variants restricted to the brain are increasingly recognized as a cause of focal epilepsies. We aimed to identify a mosaic pathogenic variant and its anatomical gradient in brain DNA derived from trace tissue on explanted stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) electrodes. METHODS: We studied a patient with nonlesional multifocal epilepsy undergoing presurgical evaluation with SEEG. After explantation, the electrodes were divided into 3 pools based on their brain location (right posterior quadrant, left posterior quadrant, hippocampus/temporal neocortex). Tissue from each pool was processed for trace DNA that was whole genome amplified prior to high-depth exome sequencing. Droplet digital PCR was performed to quantify mosaicism. A brain-specific glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) assay enabled cell-of-origin analysis. RESULTS: loss-of-function variant (c.530G>A, p.W177X) predicted to lead to nonsense-mediated decay. Strikingly, the mosaic gradient correlated strongly with the SEEG findings because the highest variant allele frequency was in the right posterior quadrant, reflecting the most epileptogenic region on EEG studies. An elevated GFAP level indicated enrichment of brain-derived cells in SEEG cell suspension. DISCUSSION: This study demonstrates a proof of concept that mosaic gradients of pathogenic variants can be established using trace tissue from explanted SEEG electrodes.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.0000000000201469

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 6 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 35

Metadata

Authors
Ye, Z., Bennett, M. F., Neal, A., Laing, J. A., Hunn, M. K., Wittayacharoenpong, T., Todaro, M., Patel, S. K., Bahlo, M., Kwan, P., O'Brien, T. J., Scheffer, I. E., Berkovic, S. F., Perucca, P., & Hildebrand, M. S.
Affiliations
The Royal Melbourne Hospital (AU)
Venue
Neurology
Published
2022-12-06
Volume
99
Issue
23
Pages
1036-1041
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W4300817072
Cited by
35
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13
FWCI
5.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Keywords
somatic mosaicism, pathogenic variants, focal epilepsy, stereoelectroencephalography, nonsense-mediated mRNA decay, glial fibrillary acidic protein, cell of origin, epileptogenic zone, preoperative assessment
MeSH terms
Potassium Channels, Sodium-Activated, Brain, DNA, Electrodes, Implanted, Electroencephalography, Epilepsies, Partial, Humans, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Stereotaxic Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review