Cited by 97Epilepsy research and treatmentPharmacological Effects and Toxicity StudiesDiet and metabolism studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Rates of Status Epilepticus and Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy in People With Genetic Developmental and Epileptic Encephalopathies

Open access

Abstract

Background and Objectives The genetic developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEEs) comprise a large group of severe epilepsy syndromes, with a wide phenotypic spectrum. Currently, the rates of convulsive status epilepticus (CSE), nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE), and sudden unexplained death in epilepsy (SUDEP) in these diseases are not well understood. We aimed to describe the proportions of patients with frequently observed genetic DEEs who developed CSE, NCSE, mortality, and SUDEP. Understanding the risks of these serious presentations in each genetic DEE will enable earlier diagnosis and appropriate management. Methods In this retrospective analysis of patients with a genetic DEE, we estimated the proportions with CSE, NCSE, and SUDEP and the overall and SUDEP-specific mortality rates for each genetic diagnosis. We included patients with a pathogenic variant in the genes SCN1A, SCN2A, SCN8A, SYNGAP1, NEXMIF, CHD2, PCDH19, STXBP1, GRIN2A, KCNT1, and KCNQ2 and with Angelman syndrome (AS). Results The cohort comprised 510 individuals with a genetic DEE, in whom we observed CSE in 47% and NCSE in 19%. The highest proportion of CSE occurred in patients with SCN1A-associated DEEs, including 181/203 (89%; 95% CI 84–93) patients with Dravet syndrome and 8/15 (53%; 95% CI 27–79) non-Dravet SCN1A-DEEs. CSE was also notable in patients with pathogenic variants in KCNT1 (6/10; 60%; 95% CI 26–88) and SCN2A (8/15; 53%; 95% CI 27–79). NCSE was common in patients with non-Dravet SCN1A-DEEs (8/15; 53%; 95% CI 27–79) and was notable in patients with CHD2-DEEs (6/14; 43%; 95% CI 18–71) and AS (6/19; 32%; 95% CI 13–57). There were 42/510 (8%) deaths among the cohort, producing a mortality rate of 6.1 per 1,000 person-years (95% CI 4.4–8.3). Cases of SUDEP accounted for 19/42 (48%) deaths. Four genes were associated with SUDEP: SCN1A, SCN2A, SCN8A, and STXBP1. The estimated SUDEP rate was 2.8 per 1,000 person-years (95% CI 1.6–4.3). Discussion We showed that proportions of patients with CSE, NCSE, and SUDEP differ for commonly encountered genetic DEEs. The estimates for each genetic DEE studied will inform early diagnosis and management of status epilepticus and SUDEP and inform disease-specific counseling for patients and families in this high-risk group of conditions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.0000000000207080

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 50 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Micelli F, Soldovieri MV, Joshi N, Weckhuysen S, Cooper E, Taglialatela M. KCNQ2-related disorders. In: Adam M, Pagon R, Ardinger H, eds. GeneReviews [online]. University of Washington; 2018. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 97

Metadata

Authors
Donnan, A. M., Schneider, A. L., Russ-Hall, S., Churilov, L., & Scheffer, I. E.
Affiliations
Royal Children's Hospital (AU)
Venue
Neurology
Published
2023-04-18
Volume
100
Issue
16
Pages
e1712-e1722
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W4319336842
Cited by
97
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 12
FWCI
19.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Epilepsiatutkimussäätiö
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Diet and metabolism studies
Keywords
convulsive status epilepticus, nonconvulsive status epilepticus, Dravet syndrome, SCN1A, KCNT1, SCN2A, CHD2, Angelman syndrome, SUDEP risk factors, SUDEP prevention
MeSH terms
Epileptic Syndromes, Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy, Potassium Channels, Sodium-Activated, Protocadherins, Death, Sudden, Epilepsies, Myoclonic, Humans, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Retrospective Studies, Status Epilepticus, Angelman Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review