Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 210

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

MRI lesion profiles in sporadic Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease

Meissner, B., Kallenberg, K., Sanchez-Juan, P., Collie, D., Summers, D. M., Almonti, S., Collins, S. J., Smith, P., Cras, P., Jansen, G. H., Brandel, J. P., Coulthart, M. B., Roberts, H., Van Everbroeck, B., Galanaud, D., Mellina, V., Will, R. G., Zerr, I.·2009·Neurology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: With respect to sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (sCJD), six molecular subtypes (MM1, MM2, MV1, MV2, VV1, and VV2) have been described, which vary with respect to age at disease onset, disease duration, early symptoms, and neuropathology. MRI signal alterations were reported to correlate with distinct Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) subtypes. This multicenter, international study aimed to describe the brain MRI findings associated with each of the sCJD molecular subtypes. METHODS: Pathologically confirmed sCJD cases with codon 129 genotype (MM, MV, and VV), PrP(Sc) type, and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) or diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) were collected in seven countries. All MRI scans were assessed for signal changes according to a standard protocol encompassing seven cortical regions, basal ganglia, thalamus, and cerebellum. RESULTS: MRI scans were evaluated in 211 CJD patients (98 MM1, 23 MM2, 19 MV1, 30 MV2, 9 VV1, and 32 VV2). Basal ganglia hyperintensities occurred most frequently in MV2, VV2, and MM1 subtypes (79, 77, and 70%). Wide cerebral cortical signal increase was most common in VV1, MM2, and MV1 subtypes (86, 77, and 77%). Thalamic hyperintensities occurred most often in VV2 (45%) and MV2 (43%). The most consistent finding across most subtypes was high signal in basal ganglia, with these abnormalities found in 63% (FLAIR) and 71% (DWI). CONCLUSION: Cortical signal increase and hyperintensities in the basal ganglia and thalamus are detected by MRI across all molecular sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease subtypes. Our findings argue that characteristic MRI lesion patterns may occur for each molecular subtype.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.0b013e3181a96e5d

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 210

Metadata

Authors
Meissner, B., Kallenberg, K., Sanchez-Juan, P., Collie, D., Summers, D. M., Almonti, S., Collins, S. J., Smith, P., Cras, P., Jansen, G. H., Brandel, J. P., Coulthart, M. B., Roberts, H., Van Everbroeck, B., Galanaud, D., Mellina, V., Will, R. G., & Zerr, I.
Venue
Neurology
Published
2009-06-09
Volume
72
Issue
23
Pages
1994-2001
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2028868322
Cited by
210
References
0
FWCI
6.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MRI lesion profiles in sporadic Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.0b013e3181a96e5d
The paper
Meissner, B., Kallenberg, K., Sanchez-Juan, P., Collie, D., Summers, D. M., Almonti, S., Collins, S. J., Smith, P., Cras, P., Jansen, G. H., Brandel, J. P., Coulthart, M. B., Roberts, H., Van Everbroeck, B., Galanaud, D., Mellina, V., Will, R. G., & Zerr, I. (2009). MRI lesion profiles in sporadic Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0b013e3181a96e5d

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.