Cited by 335Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsFree Will and AgencyNeurological disorders and treatments

The involuntary nature of conversion disorder

Open access
Voon, V., Gallea, C., Hattori, N., Bruno, M., Ekanayake, V., Hallett, M.·2010·Neurology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: What makes a movement feel voluntary, and what might make it feel involuntary? Motor conversion disorders are characterized by movement symptoms without a neurologic cause. Conversion movements use normal voluntary motor pathways, but the symptoms are paradoxically experienced as involuntary, or lacking in self-agency. Self-agency is the experience that one is the cause of one's own actions. The matched comparison between the prediction of the action consequences (feed-forward signal) and actual sensory feedback is believed to give rise to self-agency and has been in part associated with the right inferior parietal cortex. Using fMRI, we assessed the correlates of self-agency during conversion tremor. METHODS: We used a within-subject fMRI block design to compare brain activity during conversion tremor and during voluntary mimicked tremor in 8 patients. RESULTS: The random effects group analysis showed that conversion tremor compared with voluntary tremor had right temporoparietal junction (TPJ) hypoactivity (p < 0.05 family-wise error whole brain corrected) and lower functional connectivity between the right TPJ, sensorimotor regions (sensorimotor cortices and cerebellar vermis), and limbic regions (ventral anterior cingulate and right ventral striatum). CONCLUSIONS: The right TPJ has been implicated as a general comparator of internal predictions with actual events. We propose that the right TPJ hypoactivity and lower TPJ and sensorimotor cortex interactions may reflect the lack of an appropriate sensory prediction signal. The lack of a match for the proprioceptive feedback would lead to the perception that the conversion movement is not self-generated.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.0b013e3181ca00e9

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 26 · Cited by 335

Authors
Voon, V., Gallea, C., Hattori, N., Bruno, M., Ekanayake, V., & Hallett, M.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • From the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (V.V., C.G., N.H., M.B., V.E., M.H.), NIH, Bethesda, MD; and Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging (V.V.), Institute of Neurology, University College London, UK.
Venue
Neurology
Published
2010-01-19
Volume
74
Issue
3
Pages
223-228
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2170253837
Cited by
335
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 18
FWCI
15.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Free Will and Agency
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
Keywords
conversion disorder, self-agency, temporoparietal junction, proprioceptive feedback, sensory prediction, sensorimotor cortex, cerebellar vermis, ventral striatum, functional connectivity
MeSH terms
Adult, Conversion Disorder, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Psychomotor Performance, Dyskinesias, Feedback, Sensory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review