The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Structural integrity of corticospinal motor fibers predicts motor impairment in chronic stroke
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: Motor impairment after stroke has been related to infarct size, infarct location, and integrity of motor tracts. To determine the value of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) as a predictor of motor outcome and its role as a structural surrogate marker of impairment in chronic stroke, we tested correlations between motor impairment and DTI-derived measures of motor tract integrity. METHODS: Thirty-five chronic stroke patients with varying degrees of recovery underwent DTI and motor impairment assessments. Fibers originating from the precentral gyrus were traced and separated into pyramidal tract (PT) and alternate motor fibers (aMF). Asymmetry indices of fiber number and regional fractional anisotropy (FA) values comparing lesional with nonlesional hemispheres were correlated with motor impairment scores and compared to an age-matched control group. RESULTS: Fiber number and regional FA value asymmetry significantly differed between the groups with lower values in the patients' lesional hemispheres. Both measures significantly predicted motor impairment with stronger predictions when all motor tracts were combined as compared to predictions using only the PT. The pattern of motor tract damage (PT only vs PT and aMF) led to a classification of mild, moderate, or severe impairment with significant between-group differences in motor impairment scores. CONCLUSIONS: Diffusion tensor imaging-derived measures are valid structural markers of motor impairment. The integrity of all descending motor tracts, not merely the pyramidal tract, appears to account for stroke recovery. A 3-tier, hierarchical classification of impairment categories based on the pattern of motor tract damage is proposed that might be helpful in predicting recovery potential.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Thomalla, G., Glauche, V., Koch, M. A., Beaulieu, C., Weiller, C., & Röther, J. (2004) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.03.041 · Cited by 438
Cited by
Winstein, C. J., Stein, J., Arena, R., Bates, B., Cherney, L. R., Cramer, S. C., Deruyter, F., Eng, J. J., Fisher, B., Harvey, R. L., et al. (2016) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/str.0000000000000098 · Cited by 3,293
PREP2: A biomarker‐based algorithm for predicting upper limb function after stroke
Stinear, C. M., Byblow, W. D., Ackerley, S. J., Smith, M., Borges, V. M., & Barber, P. A. (2017) · Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology · doi:10.1002/acn3.488 · Cited by 359
Spontaneous and Therapeutic-Induced Mechanisms of Functional Recovery After Stroke
Cassidy, J. M., & Cramer, S. C. (2017) · Translational Stroke Research · doi:10.1007/s12975-016-0467-5 · Cited by 292
Soleman, S., Yip, P. K., Duricki, D. A., & Moon, L. D. F. (2012) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/aws027 · Cited by 123
Decoding post-stroke motor function from structural brain imaging
Rondina, J. M., Filippone, M., Girolami, M., & Ward, N. S. (2016) · NeuroImage: Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2016.07.014 · Cited by 109
Metadata
- Authors
- Lindenberg, R., Renga, V., Zhu, L. L., Betzler, F., Alsop, D., & Schlaug, G.
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 2010-01-26
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 280-287
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W2085440246
- Cited by
- 361
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 24.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Structural integrity of corticospinal motor fibers predicts motor impairment in chronic stroke. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.0b013e3181ccc6d9
- The paper
- Lindenberg, R., Renga, V., Zhu, L. L., Betzler, F., Alsop, D., & Schlaug, G. (2010). Structural integrity of corticospinal motor fibers predicts motor impairment in chronic stroke. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0b013e3181ccc6d9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.