Atomoxetine for depression and other neuropsychiatric symptoms in Parkinson disease
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES: Depression and antidepressant use, especially selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), are common in Parkinson disease (PD). The objective of this clinical trial was to assess the efficacy of atomoxetine, a selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI), for the treatment of clinically significant depressive symptoms and common comorbid neuropsychiatric symptoms in PD. METHODS: A total of 55 subjects with PD and an Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician (IDS-C) score > or = 22 were randomized to 8 weeks of atomoxetine or placebo treatment (target dosage = 80 mg/day). Depression response (> 50% decrease in IDS-C score or Clinical Global Impression-Improvement [CGI-I] score of 1 or 2) was assessed using intention-to-treat modeling procedures. Secondary outcomes included global cognition, daytime sleepiness, anxiety, apathy, and motor function. RESULTS: There were no between-groups differences in a priori-defined response rates. Using a more liberal response criterion of > 40% decrease in IDS score from baseline, there was a trend (p = 0.08) favoring atomoxetine. Patients receiving atomoxetine experienced significantly greater improvement in global cognition (p = 0.003) and daytime sleepiness (p = 0.001), and atomoxetine was well-tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Atomoxetine treatment was not efficacious for the treatment of clinically significant depressive symptoms in PD, but was associated with improvement in global cognitive performance and daytime sleepiness. Larger studies of SNRIs in PD for disorders of mood, cognition, and wakefulness are appropriate. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This interventional study provides Class II evidence that atomoxetine (target dosage = 80 mg/day) is not efficacious in improving clinically significant depression in PD.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Pharmacological treatments for depression and anxiety appear relatively ineffective in Parkinson's disease.
“Pharmacological treatments for these conditions appear relatively ineffective in Parkinson’s disease.”
From Distant delivery of a mindfulness-based intervention for people with Parkinson's disease: The study protocol of a randomised pilot trial (2017) · cites this paper as [8]
Atomoxetine is not efficacious for anxiety in Parkinson's disease.
“Atomoxetine, an effective drug treatment for anxiety in non-PD patients, was not found to be efficacious for anxiety in PD [8].”
From Distant delivery of a mindfulness-based intervention for people with Parkinson's disease: The study protocol of a randomised pilot trial (2017) · cites this paper as [8]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 40 · Cited by 255
- Authors
- Weintraub, D., Mavandadi, S., Mamikonyan, E., Siderowf, A. D., Duda, J. E., Hurtig, H. I., Colcher, A., Horn, S. S., Nazem, S., Ten Have, T. R., & Stern, M. B.
- Affiliations
- Pennsylvania Hospital (US)
- From the Department of Psychiatry (D.W., S.M., E.M., S.N.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Parkinson's Disease Research, Education and Clinical Center (D.W., J.E.D., M.B.S.), and Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center (D.W., S.M.), Philadelphia VA Medical Center; Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders Center (A.D.S., J.E.D., H.I.H., A.C., S.S.H., M.B.S.), Department of Neurology, Pennsylvania Hospital, University of Pennsylvania; and Center for Clinical Epidemiology...
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 2010-08-03
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 448-455
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- PMC
- PMC2918470
- OpenAlex
- W2000123680
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 22
- FWCI
- 12.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Neurology (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Emory University
- National Institutes of Health
- U.S. Public Health Service (NIMH 067894)
- National Institute of Mental Health (K23MH067894)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (P50NS053488)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
- Keywords
- atomoxetine, Parkinson's disease, depression, neuropsychiatric symptoms, selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, daytime sleepiness, global cognition, apathy, anxiety, motor function, antidepressant efficacy
- MeSH terms
- Atomoxetine Hydrochloride, Aged, Mental Disorders, Cognition Disorders, Depression, Double-Blind Method, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Parkinson Disease, Propylamines, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Severity of Illness Index, Sleep Wake Disorders, Time Factors, Comorbidity, Treatment Outcome, Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review