Cited by 367Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeurological Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Vascular risk factors promote conversion from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer disease

Li, J., Wang, Y.J., Zhang, M., Xu, Z.Q., Gao, C.Y., Fang, C.Q., Yan, J.C., Zhou, H.D.·2011·Neurology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Growing evidence suggests that vascular risk factors (VRF) contribute to cognitive decline. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of VRF on the conversion from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to Alzheimer disease (AD) dementia. METHODS: A total of 837 subjects with MCI were enrolled at baseline and followed up annually for 5 years. The incidence of AD dementia was investigated. A mixed random effects regression model was used to analyze the association between VRF and the progression of MCI assessed with Mini-Mental State Examination and instrumental Activities of Daily Living. Cox proportional hazard models were used to identify the association between VRF and dementia conversion, and to examine whether treatment of VRF can prevent dementia conversion. RESULTS: At the end of the follow-up, 298 subjects converted to AD dementia, while 352 remained MCI. Subjects with VRF had a faster progression in cognition and function relative to subjects without. VRF including hypertension, diabetes, cerebrovascular diseases, and hypercholesterolemia increased the risk of dementia conversion. Those subjects with MCI in whom all VRF were treated had a lower risk of dementia than those who had some VRF treated. Treatment of individual VRF including hypertension, diabetes, and hypercholesterolemia was associated with the reduced risk of AD conversion. CONCLUSION: VRF increased the risk of incident AD dementia. Treatment of VRF was associated with a reduced risk of incident AD dementia. Although our findings are observational, they suggest active intervention for VRF might reduce progression in MCI to AD dementia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.0b013e318217e7a4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 367

Authors
Li, J., Wang, Y. J., Zhang, M., Xu, Z. Q., Gao, C. Y., Fang, C. Q., Yan, J. C., & Zhou, H. D.
Affiliations
Army Medical University (CN)
Venue
Neurology
Published
2011-04-26
Volume
76
Issue
17
Pages
1485-1491
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2051064550
Cited by
367
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 35
FWCI
23.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
vascular risk factors, mild cognitive impairment, Alzheimer's disease, conversion to dementia, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, cerebrovascular disease, hypercholesterolemia, cognitive decline, dementia prevention
MeSH terms
Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Cerebrovascular Disorders, Cognition Disorders, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Mental Status Schedule, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Peptides, Regression Analysis, Residence Characteristics, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Incidence, Disease Progression, Statistics, Nonparametric, Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review