Cited by 136Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsCancer-related cognitive impairment studies

Injury markers predict time to dementia in subjects with MCI and amyloid pathology

Open access
van Rossum, Ineke A., Vos, Stephanie J.B., Burns, Leah, Knol, Dirk L., Scheltens, Philip, Soininen, Hilkka, Wahlund, Lars-Olof, Hampel, Harald +11 more·2012·Neurology

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Alzheimer disease (AD) can now be diagnosed in subjects with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) using biomarkers. However, little is known about the rate of decline in those subjects. In this cohort study, we aimed to assess the conversion rate to dementia and identify prognostic markers in subjects with MCI and evidence of amyloid pathology. METHODS: We pooled subjects from the VU University Medical Center Alzheimer Center and the Development of Screening Guidelines and Criteria for Predementia Alzheimer's Disease (DESCRIPA) study. We included subjects with MCI, an abnormal level of β-amyloid(1-42) (Aβ(1-42)) in the CSF, and at least one diagnostic follow-up visit. We assessed the effect of APOE genotype, CSF total tau (t-tau) and tau phosphorylated at threonine 181 (p-tau) and hippocampal volume on time to AD-type dementia using Cox proportional hazards models and on decline on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) using linear mixed models. RESULTS: We included 110 subjects with MCI with abnormal CSF Aβ(1-42) and a mean MMSE score of 26.3 ± 2.8. During a mean follow-up of 2.2 ± 1.0 (range 0.4-5.0) years, 63 subjects (57%) progressed to AD-type dementia. Abnormal CSF t-tau (hazard ratio [HR] 2.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-4.6, p = 0.03) and CSF p-tau (HR 3.5, 95% CI 1.3-9.2, p = 0.01) concentration and hippocampal atrophy (HR 2.5, 95% CI 1.1-5.6, p = 0.02) predicted time to dementia. For subjects with both abnormal t-tau concentration and hippocampal atrophy, HR was 7.3 (95% CI 1.0-55.9, p = 0.06). Furthermore, abnormal CSF t-tau and p-tau concentrations and hippocampal atrophy predicted decline in MMSE score. CONCLUSIONS: In subjects with MCI and evidence of amyloid pathology, the injury markers CSF t-tau and p-tau and hippocampal atrophy can predict further cognitive decline.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.0b013e3182704056

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CSF T-tau likely indicates the intensity of neuronal injury at a given point in time.

    “CSF T-tau likely indicates the intensity of neuronal injury at a given point in time [108,114,157,158].”

    From NIA‐AA Research Framework: Toward a biological definition of Alzheimer's disease (2018) · cites this paper as [157]

    The introduction describes CSF tau as a marker of neuronal injury that may reflect more advanced pathology, and the Discussion links high baseline t-tau to more rapid cognitive decline in subjects with MCI and amyloid pathology. Neither passage says that CSF t-tau indicates the intensity of neuronal injury at a given point in time. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Patients with prodromal Alzheimer's disease and elevated cerebrospinal fluid total tau tend to convert to Alzheimer's disease dementia sooner.

    “The patients with prodromal AD and increased CSF t-tau levels tended to convert sooner to AD dementia [19, 20].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 136

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. Dubois B, Feldman HH, Jacova C, et al. Research criteria for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: revising the NINCDS-ADRDA criteria. Lancet Neurol 2007;6:734 - 746.
  2. Jack CR Jr, Knopman DS, Jagust WJ, et al. Hypothetical model of dynamic biomarkers of the Alzheimer's patholog- ical cascade. Lancet Neurol 2010;9:119 -128.
  3. Jack CR Jr, Vemuri P, Wiste HJ, et al. Evidence for order- ing of Alzheimer disease biomarkers. Arch Neurol 2011; 68:1526 -1535.
  4. van Rossum IA, Visser PJ, Knol DL, et al. Injury markers but not amyloid markers are associated with rapid progres- sion from mild cognitive impairment to dementia in Alz- heimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis 2012;29:319Ϫ327.
  5. Hampel H, Teipel SJ, Fuchsberger T, et al. Value of CSF ␤-amyloid 1Ϫ42 and tau as predictors of Alzheimer's disease in patients with mild cognitive impairment. Mol Psychia- try 2004;9:705-710.
  6. Hansson O, Zetterberg H, Buchhave P, Londos E, Blen- now K, Minthon L. Association between CSF biomarkers and incipient Alzheimer's disease in patients with mild cognitive impairment: a follow-up study. Lancet Neurol 2006;5:228 -234.
  7. Herukka SK, Hallikainen M, Soininen H, Pirttila T. CSF A␤42 and tau or phosphorylated tau and prediction of progressive mild cognitive impairment. Neurology 2005; 64:1294 -1297.
  8. Korf ES, Wahlund LO, Visser PJ, Scheltens P. Medial temporal lobe atrophy on MRI predicts dementia in pa- tients with mild cognitive impairment. Neurology 2004; 63:94 -100.
  9. Visser PJ, Verhey FR, Boada M, et al. Development of screening guidelines and clinical criteria for predementia Alzheimer's disease: the DESCRIPA Study. Neuroepide- miology 2008;30:254 -265.
  10. Mulder C, Verwey NA, van der Flier WM, et al. Amyloid- ␤(1Ϫ42), total tau, and phosphorylated tau as cerebrospi- nal fluid biomarkers for the diagnosis of Alzheimer disease. Clin Chem 2010;56:248 -253.
  11. Petersen RC, Smith GE, Waring SC, Ivnik RJ, Tangalos EG, Kokmen E. Mild cognitive impairment: clinical char- acterization and outcome. Arch Neurol 1999;56:303-308.
  12. Bouwman FH, Schoonenboom SN, van der Flier WM, et al. CSF biomarkers and medial temporal lobe atrophy predict dementia in mild cognitive impairment. Neurobiol Aging 2007;28:1070 -1074.
  13. McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, Katzman R, Price D, Stadlan EM. Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer's Disease. Neurology 1984;34: 939 -944.
  14. Kolen M, Brannan RL. Test Equating: Methods and Prac- tices. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1995.
  15. van de Pol LA, Verhey F, Frisoni GB, et al. White mat- ter hyperintensities and medial temporal lobe atrophy in clinical subtypes of mild cognitive impairment: the DESCRIPA study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2009;80:1069 -1074.
  16. Wolz R, Aljabar P, Hajnal JV, Hammers A, Rueckert D. LEAP: learning embeddings for atlas propagation. Neuro- image 2010;49:1316 -1325.
  17. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state": a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician J Psychiatr Res 1975;12:189 -198.
  18. Heagerty PJ, Lumley T, Pepe MS. Time-dependent ROC curves for censored survival data and a diagnostic marker. Biometrics 2000;56:337-344.
  19. Vos S, van Rossum I, Burns L, et al. Test sequence of CSF and MRI biomarkers for prediction of AD in subjects with MCI. Neurobiol Aging 2012;33:2272Ϫ2281.
  20. Visser PJ, Verhey F, Knol DL, et al. Prevalence and prognos- tic value of CSF markers of Alzheimer's disease pathology in patients with subjective cognitive impairment or mild cogni- tive impairment in the DESCRIPA study: a prospective co- hort study. Lancet Neurol 2009;8:619 -627.
  21. Visser PJ, Kester A, Jolles J, Verhey F. Ten-year risk of dementia in subjects with mild cognitive impairment. Neurology 2006;67:1201-1207.
  22. Kester MI, van der Vlies AE, Blankenstein MA, et al. CSF biomarkers predict rate of cognitive decline in Alzheimer disease. Neurology 2009;73:1353-1358.
  23. Samgard K, Zetterberg H, Blennow K, Hansson O, Mint- hon L, Londos E. Cerebrospinal fluid total tau as a marker of Alzheimer's disease intensity. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2010;25:403-410.
  24. Jack CR Jr, Wiste HJ, Vemuri P, et al. Brain ␤-amyloid measures and magnetic resonance imaging atrophy both predict time-to-progression from mild cognitive impair- ment to Alzheimer's disease. Brain 2010;133:3336 - 3348.
  25. Schoonenboom NS, Reesink FE, Verwey NA, et al. Cerebro- spinal fluid markers for differential dementia diagnosis in a large memory clinic cohort. Neurology 2012;78:47-54.

Authors
van Rossum, I. A., Vos, S. J. B., Burns, L., Knol, D. L., Scheltens, P., Soininen, H., Wahlund, L.-O., Hampel, H., Tsolaki, M., Minthon, L., L'Italien, G., van der Flier, W. M., Teunissen, C. E., Blennow, K., Barkhof, F., Rueckert, D., Wolz, R., Verhey, F., & Visser, P. J.
Affiliations
  • From the Departments of Neurology (I.A.v.R., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., P.J.V.), Epidemiology and Biostatistics (D.L.K., W.M.v.d.F.), and Radiology (F.B.), Alzheimer Center, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology (S.J.B.V., F.V., P.J.V.), School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Alzheimer Center Limburg, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Global Health Economics and Outcomes Research (L.B., G.L.), Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, CT; Department of...
  • Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
Venue
Neurology
Published
2012-10-23
Volume
79
Issue
17
Pages
1809-1816
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2096742242
Cited by
136
References
31
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 1
FWCI
10.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • VU Research Portal (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
Keywords
mild cognitive impairment, Alzheimer's disease, conversion to dementia, amyloid pathology, total tau, phosphorylated tau, hippocampal atrophy, APOE genotype, prognostic factors, cognitive decline, Mini-Mental State Examination, cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, hippocampal volume, tau phosphorylation, APOE ε4 carriers
MeSH terms
Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Apolipoproteins E, Female, Hippocampus, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Predictive Value of Tests, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Time Factors, Cohort Studies, Multicenter Studies as Topic, Biomarkers, Amyloid beta-Peptides, tau Proteins, Disease Progression, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review