The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Placebo-controlled trial of rituximab in IgM anti-myelin–associated glycoprotein neuropathy
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether rituximab 375 mg/m(2) was efficacious in patients with immunoglobulin M (IgM) anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein antibody demyelinating neuropathy (IgM anti-MAG demyelinating neuropathy). METHODS: Fifty-four patients with IgM anti-MAG demyelinating neuropathy were enrolled in this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The inclusion criteria were inflammatory neuropathy cause and treatment (INCAT) sensory score (ISS) ≥4 and visual analog pain scale >4 or ataxia score ≥2. The primary outcome was mean change in ISS at 12 months. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were randomized to a group receiving 4 weekly infusions of 375 mg/m(2) rituximab, and 28 patients to placebo. Intention-to-treat analysis, with imputation of missing ISS values by the last observation carried forward method, showed a lack of mean change in ISS at 12 months, 1.0 ± 2.7 in the rituximab group, and 1.0 ± 2.8 in the placebo group. However, changes were observed, in per protocol analysis at 12 months, for the number of patients with an improvement of at least 2 points in the INCAT disability scale (p = 0.027), the self-evaluation scale (p = 0.016), and 2 subscores of the Short Form-36 questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: Although primary outcome measures provide no evidence to support the use of rituximab in IgM anti-MAG demyelinating neuropathy, there were improvements in several secondary outcomes in per protocol analysis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class I evidence that rituximab is ineffective in improving ISS in patients with IgM anti-MAG demyelinating neuropathy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Connelly‐Smith, L., Alquist, C. R., Aqui, N. A., Hofmann, J. C., Klingel, R., Onwuemene, O. A., Patriquin, C. J., Pham, H. P., Sanchez, A. P., Schneiderman, J., et al. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Apheresis · doi:10.1002/jca.22043 · Cited by 684
Favier, R., & Crépin, S. (2018) · Clinical Trials · doi:10.1177/1740774518760565 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Léger, J.-M., Viala, K., Nicolas, G., Créange, A., Vallat, J.-M., Pouget, J., Clavelou, P., Vial, C., Steck, A., Musset, L., Marin, B., & For the RIMAG Study Group (France and Switzerland)
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 2013-06-11
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 2217-2225
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W1998990397
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Placebo-controlled trial of rituximab in IgM anti-myelin–associated glycoprotein neuropathy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.0b013e318296e92b
- The paper
- Léger, J.-M., Viala, K., Nicolas, G., Créange, A., Vallat, J.-M., Pouget, J., Clavelou, P., Vial, C., Steck, A., Musset, L., Marin, B., & For the RIMAG Study Group (France and Switzerland). (2013). Placebo-controlled trial of rituximab in IgM anti-myelin–associated glycoprotein neuropathy. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0b013e318296e92b
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.