The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The unchanging pattern of subarachnoid hemorrhage in a community
Abstract
The average annual incidence of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) from aneurysm rupture in Rochester, Minnesota, has remained remarkably constant at about 11 per 100,000 population. Age-specific incidence increased with age. Survival after SAH depended on: (1) clinical grade, (2) time after onset of SAH, and (3) presence of intracerebral hematoma. Among those who survived to receive medical attention, 48% were clinical grade 1 or 2, 20% were grade 3, and 32% were grade 4 or 5. Proved rebleeding occurred within 10 days of the first SAH in 20% of patients who survived until hospital admission.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kassell, N. F., Torner, J. C., Haley, E. C., Jane, J. A., Adams, H. P., Kongable, G. L., & _, _. (1990) · Journal of Neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/jns.1990.73.1.0018 · Cited by 2,112
MacDonald, B. K. (2000) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/123.4.665 · Cited by 858
Metadata
- Authors
- Phillips, L. H., Whisnant, J. P., O'Fallon, W. M., & Sundt, T. M.
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 1980-10
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1034-1034
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W2024316593
- Cited by
- 389
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The unchanging pattern of subarachnoid hemorrhage in a community. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.30.10.1034
- The paper
- Phillips, L. H., Whisnant, J. P., O'Fallon, W. M., & Sundt, T. M. (1980). The unchanging pattern of subarachnoid hemorrhage in a community. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.30.10.1034
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
