Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 312

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Ocular counterrolling as an indicator of vestibular otolith function

Diamond, Shirley G., Markham, Charles H.·1983·Neurology

Abstract

Sixteen normal subjects, 8 patients with unilateral vestibular nerve section, and 11 patients with acoustic neuromas underwent dynamic ocular counterrolling (OCR) testing. Both eyes were photographed at every 10 degrees as the subject was tilted about the naso-occipital axis at a constant velocity of 3 degrees/sec. Normal subjects differed from patients in four characteristics: (1) The binocular OCR patterns of normal subjects were consistent from one trial to the next. (2) The two eyes were mostly conjugate in movement. (3) The patterns were smooth. (4) OCR was approximately symmetric to right and left tilts. In the patients, patterns were abnormal when tilted to the side opposite the lesion. In quantified measures of the four characteristics, differences between the normal group and the group of patients with unilateral vestibular nerve sections were significant in consistency and total scores. In the patients with acoustic neuromas, OCR abnormalities corresponded to the size and location of the tumors and the extent to which they impinged on the utricular nerve and brainstem.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.33.11.1460

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Diamond, S. G., & Markham, C. H.
Venue
Neurology
Published
1983-11
Volume
33
Issue
11
Pages
1460-1460
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2003519179
Cited by
312
References
0
FWCI
1.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ocular counterrolling as an indicator of vestibular otolith function. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.33.11.1460
The paper
Diamond, S. G., & Markham, C. H. (1983). Ocular counterrolling as an indicator of vestibular otolith function. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.33.11.1460

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.