The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cerebral dominance, sex, and callosal size inMRI
Abstract
We measured the MRI area of corpus callosum in 104 normal adults, 51 men, 53 women, 52 right- and 52 left-handers. There were no significant sex or handedness differences. Callosal areas did not correlate with brain size nor with measures of lateralization for hand performance, dichotic listening, or visual field preference. The results are contrary to the notion of increased callosal connectivity in left-handers, women, or individuals with less-lateralized function.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Forms and measures of adult and developing human corpus callosum: Is there sexual dimorphism?
Clarke, S., Kraftsik, R., van der Loos, H., & Innocenti, G. M. (1989) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.902800205 · Cited by 264
Unterrainer, J., Wranek, U., Staffen, W., Gruber, T., & Ladurner, G. (2000) · Neuropsychobiology · doi:10.1159/000026639 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Kertesz, A., Polk, M., Howell, J., & Black, S. E.
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 1987-08
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1385-1385
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W1975905284
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cerebral dominance, sex, and callosal size inMRI. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.37.8.1385
- The paper
- Kertesz, A., Polk, M., Howell, J., & Black, S. E. (1987). Cerebral dominance, sex, and callosal size inMRI. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.37.8.1385
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
