The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Type and extent of hemispheric brain infarctions and clinical outcome in early and delayed middle cerebral artery recanalization
Abstract
We evaluated the influence of time of recanalization or degree of initial leptomeningeal collateral blood flow in cardioembolic or arterio-arterial middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion on infarct size and clinical outcome in a series of 34 consecutive acute stroke patients with main stem (N = 31) or major branch (N = 3) occlusions using CT, initial cerebral arteriography (N = 21), repetitive close-meshed transcranial Doppler ultrasonography, and a neurologic stroke scale. We treated 15 patients with tissue plasminogen activator intravenously within the first 6 hours. The type and size of infarction depended on the location of the occluding lesions within the MCA trunk. Proximal MCA occlusion always led to infarction involving the striatum and internal capsule. Sixty-five percent of patients showed recanalization of the occluded MCA within 1 week. Following MCA recanalization, hyperperfusion was present in 38 to 44% of cases. There was a marginally significant relation between size of infarction on CT and recanalization time within the first 24 hours. The more rapidly recanalization occurred, the smaller the size of the infarct. When recanalization time was greater than 8 hours, the lesions always extended to the cortex. An additional good leptomeningeal collateral blood flow significantly reduced the size of the infarct and improved clinical outcome after 17 days and after 10 months. Early recanalization of embolic MCA occlusions within up to 8 hours, in conjunction with good transcortical collateralization, has a favorable impact on infarct size and outcome and may constitute the therapeutic window of opportunity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Higashida, R. T., & Furlan, A. J. (2003) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.0000082721.62796.09 · Cited by 1,543
Liebeskind, D. S. (2003) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.0000086465.41263.06 · Cited by 1,052
Caplan, L. R., & Hennerici, M. (1998) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneur.55.11.1475 · Cited by 869
Rodent models of focal stroke: Size, mechanism, and purpose
Carmichael, S. T. (2005) · NeuroRX · doi:10.1602/neurorx.2.3.396 · Cited by 719
Brandt, T., von Kummer, R., Müller-Küppers, M., & Hacke, W. (1996) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.27.5.875 · Cited by 484
Metadata
- Authors
- Ringelstein, E. B., Biniek, R., Weiller, C., Ammeling, B., Nolte, P. N., & Thron, A.
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 1992-02
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 289-289
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W2125955807
- Cited by
- 393
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Type and extent of hemispheric brain infarctions and clinical outcome in early and delayed middle cerebral artery recanalization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.42.2.289
- The paper
- Ringelstein, E. B., Biniek, R., Weiller, C., Ammeling, B., Nolte, P. N., & Thron, A. (1992). Type and extent of hemispheric brain infarctions and clinical outcome in early and delayed middle cerebral artery recanalization. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.42.2.289
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.