Cited by 133Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsPolyomavirus and related diseases

Assessment of MRI criteria for a diagnosis of MS

Offenbacher, H., Fazekas, F., Schmidt, R., Freidl, W., Flooh, E., Payer, F., Lechner, H.·1993·Neurology

Abstract

To test the reliability of four previously proposed MRI criteria for the diagnosis of MS, we reviewed 1,500 consecutive brain scans for the presence, number, size, and location of areas of increased signal (AIS) on proton-density and T2-weighted images, unaware of the patients' clinical presentations and ages. This series included 134 subjects with a clinical diagnosis of MS. Relying exclusively on the presence of at least three or four AIS for a positive diagnosis of MS resulted in high sensitivity (90% for three AIS and 87% for four) but inadequate specificity (71% for three AIS and 74% for four) and positive predictive value (23% for three AIS and 25% for four). If one of these lesions was required to border the lateral ventricles, specificity was 92% and positive predictive value was 50% at a sensitivity of 87%. Using the Fazekas criteria (at least three AIS and two of the following features: abutting body of lateral ventricles, infratentorial lesion location, and size > 5 mm) led to a further highly significant improvement of specificity (96%; p = 0.0000) and increase of the positive predictive value (65%) at the expense of a less significant decrease in sensitivity (81%; p < 0.01).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.43.5.905

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When a patient presents with symptoms or signs that could indicate MS, an MRI is essential as an abnormal brain MRI is seen in virtually all patients with established MS and over 80% of CIS patients who develop MS.

    “When a patient presents with symptoms or signs that could indicate MS, an MRI is essential as an abnormal brain MRI is seen in virtually all patients with established MS 7 and over 80% of CIS patients who develop MS. 8”

    From Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: progress and challenges (2017) · cites this paper as [7]

  • Establishing a diagnosis of MS can be more difficult in older adults because white matter lesions due to small-vessel cerebrovascular disease are frequently found on brain MRI.

    “Establishing a diagnosis of MS can be more difficult in older adults because white matter lesions due to small-vessel cerebrovascular disease are frequently found on brain MRI.7,37”

    From Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: progress and challenges (2017) · cites this paper as [7]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Offenbacher, H., Fazekas, F., Schmidt, R., Freidl, W., Flooh, E., Payer, F., & Lechner, H.
Affiliations
University of Graz (AT)
Venue
Neurology
Published
1993-05
Volume
43
Issue
5
Pages
905-905
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2001061071
Cited by
133
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Polyomavirus and related diseases
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, MRI diagnostic criteria, brain lesions, sensitivity and specificity, positive predictive value, proton density-weighted imaging, T2-weighted imaging
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Brain, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Sclerosis, Predictive Value of Tests, Sensitivity and Specificity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review