A comparison of familial and sporadic Alzheimer's disease
Abstract
Using a liberal criterion, a conservative probability-based criterion, and a criterion for autosomal dominant inheritance, we classified 36%, 13.5%, and 6.4% of 311 patients, respectively, as having familial Alzheimer's disease (FAD). The mean age of onset was over 70 years for all three categories of FAD. FAD and sporadic Alzheimer's disease (SAD) cases did not differ in clinical features, incidence of risk factors for dementia, or MRI or PET features. We observed earlier age of onset of AD to be related positively to longer duration of disease. Except for the autosomal dominant AD group, there was an earlier age of onset in FAD probands. The inheritance of AD from mothers was from 1.7 to 3.6 times more frequent than from fathers. Among SAD patients only, we found a preponderance of women, who were more frequently affected than would be expected from the male/female ratio in the general population of the same average age. Language performance tended to be less affected in FAD than in SAD patients, contrary to some previous reports.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Both mothers and fathers contribute to their offspring's AD risk, but mothers contribute more because mtDNA is maternally inherited.
“In this respect, both mothers and fathers contribute to their offspring's AD risk, but because mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is maternally inherited mothers contribute more.”
From The Alzheimer’s disease mitochondrial cascade hypothesis: progress and perspectives (2014) · cites this paper as [114]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 47 · Cited by 122
- Authors
- Duara, R., Lopez-Alberola, R. F., Barker, W. W., Loewenstein, D. A., Zatinsky, M., Eisdorfer, C. E., & Weinberg, G. B.
- Affiliations
- University of Miami (US)
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 1993-07
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1377-1377
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W2041155216
- Cited by
- 122
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 6.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neurology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
- Keywords
- familial Alzheimer's disease, sporadic Alzheimer's disease, autosomal dominant inheritance, age of onset, disease duration, maternal inheritance, sex differences, language performance, dementia risk factors
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Analysis of Variance, Brain, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Risk Factors, Tomography, Emission-Computed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review