The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Age and education correction of Mini-Mental State Examination for English- and Spanish-speaking elderly
Abstract
Previous research has shown that the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMS) is biased as a measure of cognitive impairment in minority and low-education patients. The purpose of this study was to (1) develop a statistical correction for effects of age and education and (2) test the efficacy of the statistically adjusted MMS (MMSAdj) as a screening test for dementia using different ethnic groups and education levels. We used a population-base community survey sample (n=590) composed of 46.6% Hispanics and 53.4% non-Hispanics to derive the statistical correction, defined as:MMSAdj = Raw MMS - (0.471 X [Education-12]) + (0.131 X [Age-70]). Ethnicity and language of test administration were not significantly related to MMSAdj in the community survey sample, but the raw MMS was strongly influenced by these factors. We used an independent sample (n=2,983) of patients evaluated through the California Alzheimer's Disease Diagnostic and Treatment Centers to test the diagnostic accuracy of the MMS and the MMSAdj across low- and high-education groups and across whites, Hispanics, and blacks. Results showed greater stability of sensitivity and specificity across education levels and ethnic groups for the MMSAdj than for the raw MMS and suggest that the MMSAdj is a preferable measure of cognitive impairment for low- education and minority individuals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Discrimination between Alzheimer dementia and controls by automated analysis of multicenter FDG PET
Herholz, K., Salmon, E., Perani, D., Baron, J.-C., Holthoff, V., Frölich, L., Schönknecht, P., Ito, K., Mielke, R., & Kalbe, E. (2002) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2002.1208 · Cited by 832
Creavin, S. T., Wisniewski, S., Noel-Storr, A. H., Trevelyan, C. M., Hampton, T., Rayment, D., Thom, V. M., Nash, K. J. E., Elhamoui, H., Milligan, R., et al. (2016) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd011145.pub2 · Cited by 820
Clinical validity of the ‘mini-mental state’ for Spanish speaking communities
Blesa, R., Pujol, M., Aguilar, M., Santacruz, P., Bertran-Serra, I., Hernández, G., Sol, J. M., & Peña-Casanova, J. (2001) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/s0028-3932(01)00055-0 · Cited by 440
Haan, M. N., Mungas, D. M., Gonzalez, H. M., Ortiz, T. A., Acharya, A., & Jagust, W. J. (2003) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1046/j.1532-5415.2003.51054.x · Cited by 420
Self-citationBorson, S., Scanlan, J. M., Watanabe, J., Tu, S., & Lessig, M. (2005) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53269.x · Cited by 318
Metadata
- Authors
- Mungas, D., Marshall, S. C., Weldon, M., Haan, M., & Reed, B. R.
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 1996-03
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 700-706
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W2009702190
- Cited by
- 343
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Age and education correction of Mini-Mental State Examination for English- and Spanish-speaking elderly. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.46.3.700
- The paper
- Mungas, D., Marshall, S. C., Weldon, M., Haan, M., & Reed, B. R. (1996). Age and education correction of Mini-Mental State Examination for English- and Spanish-speaking elderly. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.46.3.700
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.