The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evolving stroke and the ischemic penumbra
Abstract
Deterioration of the neurologic deficits that occur hours or even days after the initial presentation is a well-recognized feature of ischemic stroke. In several recent series of prospectively evaluated ischemic stroke patients, the frequency of neurologic worsening ranged from 26 to 43%, and the rate of deterioration was similar in patients evaluated either within 6 to 8 hours or within 1 to 2 days after the onset of symptoms. [1-3] These rates of progression were similar to those previously observed by Jones and Millikan [4] and Jones et al. [5] in patients with either carotid or vertebrobasilar arterial occlusions who were evaluated within 36 hours of stroke onset, although a higher percentage of vertebrobasilar system stroke patients deteriorated at a later time. The definition of neurologic worsening after stroke has varied from study to study, making direct comparisons difficult. With the advent of valid, reproducible neurologic scoring scales, such as the NIH Stroke Scale and the Scandinavian Stroke Scale, a more precise perspective on short-term clinical worsening after acute ischemic stroke will be available from the data that the current plethora of acute stroke intervention trials will provide. [6] The factors that make the deficit worsen are not known. The object of this review is to advance the concept that, in some patients with ischemic stroke, the progression of the neurologic deficits shortly after the ictus relates to the deterioration of the local circulation in which an initially ischemic, but functional, region progresses to a non-functional state and ultimately to infarction. The concept of evolving or progressing stroke initially appeared in the 1950s. [7,8] Several mechanisms potentially contribute to the phenomenon of evolving stroke, and early authors emphasized thrombus propagation despite scarce confirmation of this hypothesis. [9] Other potential mechanisms for the increasing clinical deterioration that may occur during the …
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Lewy body variant of Alzheimer's disease: A clinical and pathologic entity
Hansen, L., Salmon, D., Galasko, D., Masliah, E., Katzman, R., DeTeresa, R., Thal, L., Pay, M. M., Hofstetter, R., Klauber, M., et al. (1990) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.40.1.1 · Cited by 1,068
Cited by
Hacke, W., Kaste, M., Fieschi, C., von Kummer, R., Davalos, A., Meier, D., Larrue, V., Bluhmki, E., Davis, S., Donnan, G., et al. (1998) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(98)08020-9 · Cited by 3,662
Ischemic Cell Death in Brain Neurons
Lipton, P. (1999) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.1999.79.4.1431 · Cited by 3,043
The complexity of neurobiological processes in acute ischemic stroke
Brouns, R., & De Deyn, P. P. (2009) · Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery · doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2009.04.001 · Cited by 526
Shih, A. Y., Li, P., & Murphy, T. H. (2005) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4014-05.2005 · Cited by 413
Dávalos, A., Toni, D., Iweins, F., Lesaffre, E., Bastianello, S., & Castillo, J. (1999) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.30.12.2631 · Cited by 332
Metadata
- Authors
- Fisher, M., & Garcia, J. H.
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 1996-10
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 884-888
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W2146284181
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evolving stroke and the ischemic penumbra. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.47.4.884
- The paper
- Fisher, M., & Garcia, J. H. (1996). Evolving stroke and the ischemic penumbra. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.47.4.884
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.