Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 189

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evolving stroke and the ischemic penumbra

Fisher, Marc, Garcia, Julio H.·1996·Neurology

Abstract

Deterioration of the neurologic deficits that occur hours or even days after the initial presentation is a well-recognized feature of ischemic stroke. In several recent series of prospectively evaluated ischemic stroke patients, the frequency of neurologic worsening ranged from 26 to 43%, and the rate of deterioration was similar in patients evaluated either within 6 to 8 hours or within 1 to 2 days after the onset of symptoms. [1-3] These rates of progression were similar to those previously observed by Jones and Millikan [4] and Jones et al. [5] in patients with either carotid or vertebrobasilar arterial occlusions who were evaluated within 36 hours of stroke onset, although a higher percentage of vertebrobasilar system stroke patients deteriorated at a later time. The definition of neurologic worsening after stroke has varied from study to study, making direct comparisons difficult. With the advent of valid, reproducible neurologic scoring scales, such as the NIH Stroke Scale and the Scandinavian Stroke Scale, a more precise perspective on short-term clinical worsening after acute ischemic stroke will be available from the data that the current plethora of acute stroke intervention trials will provide. [6] The factors that make the deficit worsen are not known. The object of this review is to advance the concept that, in some patients with ischemic stroke, the progression of the neurologic deficits shortly after the ictus relates to the deterioration of the local circulation in which an initially ischemic, but functional, region progresses to a non-functional state and ultimately to infarction. The concept of evolving or progressing stroke initially appeared in the 1950s. [7,8] Several mechanisms potentially contribute to the phenomenon of evolving stroke, and early authors emphasized thrombus propagation despite scarce confirmation of this hypothesis. [9] Other potential mechanisms for the increasing clinical deterioration that may occur during the …

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.47.4.884

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 189

Metadata

Authors
Fisher, M., & Garcia, J. H.
Venue
Neurology
Published
1996-10
Volume
47
Issue
4
Pages
884-888
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2146284181
Cited by
189
References
1
FWCI
12.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evolving stroke and the ischemic penumbra. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.47.4.884
The paper
Fisher, M., & Garcia, J. H. (1996). Evolving stroke and the ischemic penumbra. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.47.4.884

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.