The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pain in Guillain-Barre syndrome
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine the character, intensity and frequency of pain in Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) and to evaluate the response to treatment. DESIGN: A prospective longitudinal study. SETTING: Academic hospital-based practices. PATIENTS: Fifty-five consecutive patients with GBS. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were evaluated on admission and at 2, 4, 8, 16, and 24 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Character of pain, pain intensity using Visual Analogue Scale ([VAS] 0 to 10 cm) and Present Pain Intensity of McGill Pain Questionnaire, pain relief (VAS 0 to 10 cm), Disability Grading Scale for GBS. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients (89.1%) described pain during the course of their illness. On admission, mean pain intensity (VAS) was 4.7 +/- 3.3. However, 26 patients (47.3%) described pain that was either distressing, horrible, or excruciating (mean VAS, 7.0 +/- 2.0). The most common pain syndromes observed were deep aching back and leg pain and dysesthetic extremity pain. Pain intensity on admission correlated poorly with neurologic disability on admission (r = 0.26, p = 0.06) and throughout the period of study (r < 0.20, p > 0.10). Forty-one patients (74.5%) required opioid analgesics, with 16 (29.0%) receiving parenteral morphine to provide adequate pain relief. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate to severe pain is a common and early symptom of GBS and requires aggressive treatment. Pain intensity on admission is not a predictor of poor prognosis. Back and leg pain usually resolves over the first 8 weeks, but dysesthetic extremity pain may persist longer in 5 to 10% of patients despite motor recovery and the use of adjuvant analgesics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Beyond Neurons: Evidence That Immune and Glial Cells Contribute to Pathological Pain States
Watkins, L. R., & Maier, S. F. (2002) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00011.2002 · Cited by 733
CADASIL: a review with proposed diagnostic criteria
Davous, P. (1998) · European Journal of Neurology · doi:10.1046/j.1468-1331.1998.530219.x · Cited by 161
Metadata
- Authors
- Moulin, D. E., Hagen, N., Feasby, T. E., Amireh, R., & Hahn, A.
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 1997-02
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 328-331
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W2051195513
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pain in Guillain-Barre syndrome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.48.2.328
- The paper
- Moulin, D. E., Hagen, N., Feasby, T. E., Amireh, R., & Hahn, A. (1997). Pain in Guillain-Barre syndrome. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.48.2.328
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.