The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pain after thalarnic stroke: Right diencephalic predominance and clinical features in 180 patients
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether the thalamic pain syndrome of Dejerine-Roussy is produced preferentially by right diencephalic lesions and to elucidate its clinical features. BACKGROUND: Several experimental paradigms suggest that the right hemisphere is specialized for monitoring somatic states, including mediating pain. However, clinical studies of pain laterality have been inconclusive, possibly due to pathophysiologic diversity among analyzed patients. We collected reports of central pain laterality in a single, well-demarcated disorder, the Déjerine-Roussy syndrome. DESIGN/METHODS: Reports from English, French, and German literature were identified through Medline search and bibliography-guided retrieval. Inclusion criteria were (1) thalamic lesion documented by CT, MRI, or postmortem examination and (2) contralateral pain. Exclusion criteria were (1) tumoral/nonvascular etiology (to optimize anatomic localization), (2) symptoms consisting solely of evoked dysesthesia without spontaneous pain, or (3) sidedness of lesion not clearly indicated. Cases were analyzed for laterality as well as secondary anatomic and clinical variables. RESULTS: Literature search identified 274 cases. After exclusions, 180 remained. A total of 114 had a right-sided thalamic lesion, 66 left-sided (p < 0.001). Laterality predominance was greater among men than women. The frequency of other components of the Dejerine-Roussy syndrome--sensory impairment, hemiparesis, ataxia, and choreoathetosis--did not significantly differ between right and left groups. Pain onset was within the first week poststroke in 36%. Frequency of spontaneous pain was 14% after any thalamic stroke and 24% after geniculothalamic artery territory stroke. CONCLUSION: Right-sided lesions predominate among reported cases of the thalamic pain syndrome. This preferential involvement of the nondominant thalamus in pain processing is supportive evidence of a nondominant hemisphere specialization in monitoring somatic states.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Griggs, R. C. (1997) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.48.1.1 · Cited by 123
Cited by
Schmahmann, J. D., & Pandya, D. N. (2006) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195104233.001.0001 · Cited by 1,157
Post Stroke Pain: Identification, Assessment, and Therapy
Harrison, R. A., & Field, T. S. (2015) · Cerebrovascular Diseases · doi:10.1159/000375397 · Cited by 419
Disconnection syndromes of basal ganglia, thalamus, and cerebrocerebellar systems
SCHMAHMANN, J., & PANDYA, D. (2008) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2008.04.004 · Cited by 279
Graff-Guerrero, A., González-Olvera, J., Fresán, A., Gómez-Martín, D., Carlos Méndez-Núñez, J., & Pellicer, F. (2005) · Cognitive Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.05.002 · Cited by 154
Metadata
- Authors
- Nasreddine, Z. S., & Saver, J. L.
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 1997-05
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1196-1199
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W2068485045
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pain after thalarnic stroke: Right diencephalic predominance and clinical features in 180 patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.48.5.1196
- The paper
- Nasreddine, Z. S., & Saver, J. L. (1997). Pain after thalarnic stroke: Right diencephalic predominance and clinical features in 180 patients. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.48.5.1196
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.