The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Preclinical prediction of Alzheimer's disease using SPECT
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Regional cerebral perfusion measured by single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) was examined as a preclinical predictor of the development of Alzheimer's disease (AD). METHODS: Singular value decomposition was used to produce 20 SPECT factors (known as vectors) (n=152). Vector scores were then computed for four groups (n=136), differing in cognitive status: Group 1--normal controls at both baseline and follow-up; Group 2--subjects with "questionable" AD at both baseline and follow-up; Group 3--subjects with questionable AD at baseline who converted to AD on follow-up (Converters); Group 4--subjects with AD at baseline. All SPECT data in the analyses were gathered at baseline. RESULTS: The four groups could be distinguished on the basis of their baseline SPECT data (p < or = 0.00005; hit rate=83%). Regional decreases in perfusion were most prominent among Converters in the hippocampal-amygdaloid complex, the posterior cingulate, the anterior thalamus, and the anterior cingulate. Inclusion of apolipoprotein E status did not significantly improve the discrimination. CONCLUSIONS: SPECT data gathered and analyzed in this manner may be useful as one aspect of the preclinical prediction of AD. Three of the four brain regions important for discriminating Converters from normal controls involve a distributed brain network pertaining to memory, suggesting that this network may be selectively affected in the earliest stages of AD.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Reduced size or glucose metabolism (METglu) in the EC (10), Hip (11–16), temporal neocortex (17–20), and posterior cingulate gyrus (16) have been shown to predict the MCI conversion to AD.”
From Prediction of cognitive decline in normal elderly subjects with 2-[ 18 F]fluoro-2-deoxy- d -glucose/positron-emission tomography (FDG/PET) (2001) · cites this paper as [16]
In the citing paper
“The recent SPECT study by Johnson et al. (16) demonstrated that reduced perfusion of the Hip and posterior cingulate gyrus predicted AD.”
From Prediction of cognitive decline in normal elderly subjects with 2-[ 18 F]fluoro-2-deoxy- d -glucose/positron-emission tomography (FDG/PET) (2001) · cites this paper as [16]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fischl, B., Salat, D. H., Busa, E., Albert, M., Dieterich, M., Haselgrove, C., van der Kouwe, A., Killiany, R., Kennedy, D., Klaveness, S., et al. (2002) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00569-x · Cited by 8,610
Self-citationFunctional connectivity in the resting brain: a network analysis of the default mode hypothesis
Greicius, M. D., Krasnow, B., Reiss, A. L., & Menon, V. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0135058100 · Cited by 6,358
Gauthier, S. G., Reisberg, ., Zaudig, M., Petersen, R. C., Ritchie, K. A., Broich, K., Belleville, S., Brodaty, H., Bennett, D. A., Chertkow, H. M., et al. (2006) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(06)68542-5 · Cited by 4,094
Greicius, M. D., Srivastava, G., Reiss, A. L., & Menon, V. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0308627101 · Cited by 3,684
The role of the posterior cingulate cortex in cognition and disease
Leech, R., & Sharp, D. J. (2014) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awt162 · Cited by 2,247
“These metabolic changes might reflect damage in remote but connected regions (Johnson et al., 1998).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Johnson, K. A., Jones, K., Holman, B. L., Becker, J. A., Spiers, P. A., Satlin, A., & Albert, M. S.
- Affiliations
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 1998-06
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1563-1571
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W1964965688
- Cited by
- 471
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 15.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neurology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5r01ag009301-08)
- National Institute on Aging (R01-AG09301, P01AG004953)
- National Center for Research Resources (M01RR000088)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- Alzheimer's disease, single photon emission computed tomography, regional cerebral blood flow, singular value decomposition, posterior cingulate cortex, anterior thalamic nuclei, anterior cingulate cortex, apolipoprotein E, memory networks, cognitive decline
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Brain, Cerebrovascular Circulation, Female, Forecasting, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon, Discriminant Analysis, Disease Progression
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review