Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,113

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Is the underlying cause of epilepsy a major prognostic factor for recurrence?

Semah, F., Picot, M.-C., Adam, C., Broglin, D., Arzimanoglou, A., Bazin, B., Cavalcanti, D., Baulac, M.·1998·Neurology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We investigated the prognostic value of the type of epilepsies and epileptic syndromes for seizure recurrence. In patients with partial epilepsy, we focused on the prognostic value of any structural brain abnormality and of the location of the epileptogenic region. METHODS: A total of 2,200 adult outpatients were included in a hospital-based observational survey, with a follow-up of 1 to 7 years. Twenty-two percent of the patients exhibited generalized epilepsy, 62% partial epilepsy, and 16% undetermined epilepsy. RESULTS: Seizure control (>1 year without seizure) was achieved in 82% of patients who had idiopathic generalized epilepsy, 35% of those with symptomatic partial epilepsy, 45% of those with cryptogenic partial epilepsy, and 11% of those with partial epilepsy associated with hippocampal sclerosis (HS). Temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) was the most refractory partial epilepsy, with only 20% of such patients remaining seizure free, compared with 36% of extra-TLE patients. In partial epilepsy, HS, cerebral dysgenesis, and dual pathology (HS and another lesion) were associated with a low rate of seizure-free patients (11%, 24%, and 3%, respectively). No significant difference in seizure control was found between patients with extra-TLE and those with TLE and no HS. CONCLUSIONS: In adults, partial epilepsy is more difficult to treat than idiopathic generalized epilepsy. In patients who have partial epilepsy, the location of the epileptogenic zone does not seem to be a determining factor. Brain abnormalities--especially HS, either alone or associated with another lesion--are a major prognostic factor.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.51.5.1256

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 1,113

Metadata

Authors
Semah, F., Picot, M.-C., Adam, C., Broglin, D., Arzimanoglou, A., Bazin, B., Cavalcanti, D., & Baulac, M.
Venue
Neurology
Published
1998-11
Volume
51
Issue
5
Pages
1256-1262
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2096695182
Cited by
1,113
References
1
FWCI
14.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Is the underlying cause of epilepsy a major prognostic factor for recurrence? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.51.5.1256
The paper
Semah, F., Picot, M.-C., Adam, C., Broglin, D., Arzimanoglou, A., Bazin, B., Cavalcanti, D., & Baulac, M. (1998). Is the underlying cause of epilepsy a major prognostic factor for recurrence? Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.51.5.1256

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.