The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Normal diffusion-weighted MRI during stroke-like deficits
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) represents a major advance in the early diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke. When abnormal in patients with stroke-like deficit, DWI usually establishes the presence and location of ischemic brain injury. However, this is not always the case. OBJECTIVE: To investigate patients with stroke-like deficits occurring without DWI abnormalities in brain regions clinically suspected to be responsible. METHODS: We identified 27 of 782 consecutive patients scanned when stroke-like neurologic deficits were still present and who had normal DWI in the brain region(s) clinically implicated. Based on all the clinical and radiologic data, we attempted to arrive at a pathophysiologic diagnosis in each. RESULTS: Best final diagnosis was a stroke mimic in 37% and a cerebral ischemic event in 63%. Stroke mimics (10 patients) included migraine, seizures, functional disorder, transient global amnesia, and brain tumor. The remaining patients were considered to have had cerebral ischemic events: lacunar syndrome (7 patients; 3 with infarcts demonstrated subsequently) and hemispheric cortical syndrome (10 patients; 5 with TIA, 2 with prolonged reversible deficits, 3 with infarction on follow-up imaging). In each of the latter three patients, the regions destined to infarct showed decreased perfusion on the initial hemodynamically weighted MRI (HWI). CONCLUSIONS: Normal DWI in patients with stroke-like deficits should stimulate a search for nonischemic cause of symptoms. However, more than one-half of such patients have an ischemic cause as the best clinical diagnosis. Small brainstem lacunar infarctions may escape detection. Concomitant HWI can identify some patients with brain ischemia that is symptomatic but not yet to the stage of causing DWI abnormality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Viability thresholds and the penumbra of focal ischemia
Hossmann, K. (1994) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.410360404 · Cited by 1,370
Cited by
Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging of the Brain
Schaefer, P. W., Grant, P. E., & Gonzalez, R. G. (2000) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.217.2.r00nv24331 · Cited by 1,052
Self-citationCharacteristics of patients with minor ischaemic strokes and negative MRI: a cross sectional study
Doubal, F. N., Dennis, M. S., & Wardlaw, J. M. (2011) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.2009.190298 · Cited by 80
Metadata
- Authors
- Ay, H., Buonanno, F. S., Rordorf, G., Schaefer, P. W., Schwamm, L. H., Wu, O., Gonzalez, R. G., Yamada, K., Sorensen, G. A., & Koroshetz, W. J.
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 1999-06
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1784-1784
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W2100859407
- Cited by
- 271
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Normal diffusion-weighted MRI during stroke-like deficits. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.52.9.1784
- The paper
- Ay, H., Buonanno, F. S., Rordorf, G., Schaefer, P. W., Schwamm, L. H., Wu, O., Gonzalez, R. G., Yamada, K., Sorensen, G. A., & Koroshetz, W. J. (1999). Normal diffusion-weighted MRI during stroke-like deficits. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.52.9.1784
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.