Cited by 397Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsCognitive Abilities and Testing

APOE -ε4 count predicts age when prevalence of AD increases, then declines: The Cache County Study

Breitner, J.C. S., Wyse, B.W., Anthony, J.C., Welsh-Bohmer, K.A., Steffens, D.C., Norton, M.C., Tschanz, J.T., Plassman, B.L. +3 more·1999·Neurology

Abstract

Objective To examine the prevalence of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and other dementias in relation to age, education, sex, and genotype at APOE. Recent studies suggest age heterogeneity in the risk of AD associated with the APOE genotype and a possible interaction between APOE-epsilon4 and female sex as risk factors. We studied these topics in the 5,677 elderly residents of Cache County, Utah, a population known for long life expectancy and high participation rates. Methods We screened for dementia with a brief cognitive test and structured telephone Dementia Questionnaire, then examined all individuals with apparent cognitive symptoms and a sample of others. We estimated age-specific prevalence of AD and other dementias and used multiple logistic regression models to describe relation of AD prevalence to age, sex, education, and APOE genotype. Results We found 335 demented individuals, 230 (69%) with definite, probable, or possible AD (positive predictive value versus autopsy confirmation 85%). The adjusted prevalence estimate for AD was 6.5% and for all dementias 9.6%. After age 90, the adjusted prevalence estimate for AD was 28% and for all dementias 38%. Regression models showed strong variation in AD prevalence with age, sex, education, and number of epsilon4 alleles (effect of epsilon2 not significant). Models were improved by a term for age-squared (negative coefficient) and by separate terms for interaction of age with presence of one or two epsilon4 alleles. An associat…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.53.2.321

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 44 · Cited by 397

Authors
Breitner, J. C. S., Wyse, B. W., Anthony, J. C., Welsh-Bohmer, K. A., Steffens, D. C., Norton, M. C., Tschanz, J. T., Plassman, B. L., Meyer, M. R., Skoog, I., & Khachaturian, A.
Affiliations
Utah State University (US)
Venue
Neurology
Published
1999-07
Volume
53
Issue
2
Pages
321-321
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2071384428
Cited by
397
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 20
FWCI
9.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (AG11-380, R01AG011380)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH-14592, T32MH014592)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, APOE ε4, APOE genotype, dementia prevalence, age-specific prevalence, sex differences, female sex as risk factor, population attributable risk, Cache County, Utah, elderly residents
MeSH terms
Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Apolipoproteins E, Female, Genotype, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Predictive Value of Tests, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Prevalence, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution, Apolipoprotein E4

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review