Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 587

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The prevalence and characteristics of migraine in a population-based cohort: The GEM Study

Launer, Lenore J., Terwindt, Gisela M., Ferrari, Michael D.·1999·Neurology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the distribution of migraine and its subtypes in the general population. BACKGROUND: Previous population-based studies are limited by small samples or a narrow age range, do not provide prevalence estimates of migraine with and without aura, or underestimate prevalence by not accounting for patients missed as a result of using imperfect screening instruments. METHODS: The participants in the Genetic Epidemiology of Migraine Study were comprised of 6,491 adults, age 20 to 65 years, selected randomly from two county population registries in the Netherlands to participate in a general health survey (52.7% response). Migraineurs were identified as follows: All participants were screened on headache history. Those meeting screen-positive criteria were given a detailed questionnaire on headache. A total of 1,292 randomly selected screen-positives (83% of screen-positives) and 197 randomly selected screen-negatives (5% of screen-negatives) were administered a semistructured clinical interview by telephone. Final diagnosis met 1988 International Headache Society criteria. Prevalence of migraine was estimated for sex and 5-year age strata. RESULTS: The lifetime prevalence of migraine in women was 33% and the 1-year prevalence of migraine in women was 25%. In men, the lifetime prevalence was 13.3% and the 1-year prevalence was 7.5%. Among patients with migraine in the past year, 63.9% had migraine without aura, 17.9% had migraine with aura, and 13.1% had migraine both with and without aura. The prevalence of migraine was significantly higher in women and not associated with socioeconomic status. Migraineurs suffered a median of 12 migraine attacks per year; 25% had at least two attacks per month. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of migraine is higher then previously reported. The coexistence of migraine with and without aura occurs frequently and has implications for future studies on the genetics of migraine.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.53.3.537

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 21 references

Cited by

See all 587

Metadata

Authors
Launer, L. J., Terwindt, G. M., & Ferrari, M. D.
Venue
Neurology
Published
1999-08
Volume
53
Issue
3
Pages
537-537
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2142961788
Cited by
587
References
21
FWCI
10.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The prevalence and characteristics of migraine in a population-based cohort: The GEM Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.53.3.537
The paper
Launer, L. J., Terwindt, G. M., & Ferrari, M. D. (1999). The prevalence and characteristics of migraine in a population-based cohort: The GEM Study. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.53.3.537

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.