The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Geographic variation of MS incidence in two prospective studies of US women
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the incidence of MS and its relation to latitude in two ongoing prospective studies of US women. BACKGROUND: A higher incidence of MS has been found in northern areas compared with southern areas of the United States and other countries, but the attenuation of this gradient in Europe in the last few decades and the consideration of ethnic factors have led some authors to question the existence of a strong association between MS and latitude. METHODS: The authors identified new cases of MS among participants in the Nurses' Health Study (NHS), which took place between 1976 and 1994, and in the Nurses' Health Study II (NHS II), which took place between 1989 and 1995. The NHS included women born between 1920 and 1946, and the NHS II included women born between 1947 and 1964. RESULTS: The incidence of MS among NHS participants (181 definite/probable patients) increased significantly with latitude (p = 0.03, trend). Adjusted rate ratios were 3.5 (95% CI, 1.1, 11.3) for the north and 2.7 (95% CI, 0.8, 8.9) for the middle tiers relative to the southern tier. Among NHS II women (131 definite/probable patients), no association between latitude and MS was found (p = 0.89, trend). Adjusted rate ratios were 0.8 (95% CI, 0.4, 1.6) for the northern areas and 0.9 (95%, 0.4, 1.8) for the middle areas, relative to the southern areas. CONCLUSION: The association between latitude and risk of MS in the United States was corroborated, but there was an attenuation of the north-south gradient over time. If confirmed, this finding could provide new clues to identifying environmental causes of the disease.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Holick, M. F. (2004) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/80.6.1678s · Cited by 2,762
The Effect of Infections on Susceptibility to Autoimmune and Allergic Diseases
Bach, J.-F. (2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra020100 · Cited by 2,687
Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Levels and Risk of Multiple Sclerosis
Munger, K. L., Levin, L. I., Hollis, B. W., Howard, N. S., & Ascherio, A. (2006) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.296.23.2832 · Cited by 1,897
Self-citationGlobal vitamin D status and determinants of hypovitaminosis D
on behalf of the IOF Committee of Scientific Advisors (CSA) Nutrition Working Group, Mithal, A., Wahl, D. A., Bonjour, J.-P., Burckhardt, P., Dawson-Hughes, B., Eisman, J. A., El-Hajj Fuleihan, G., Josse, R. G., Lips, P., et al. (2009) · Osteoporosis International · doi:10.1007/s00198-009-0954-6 · Cited by 1,472
The prevalence of multiple sclerosis in the world: an update
Rosati, G. (2001) · Neurological Sciences · doi:10.1007/s100720170011 · Cited by 656
Metadata
- Authors
- Hernán, M. A., Olek, M. J., & Ascherio, A.
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 1999-11
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1711-1711
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W2045027053
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Geographic variation of MS incidence in two prospective studies of US women. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.53.8.1711
- The paper
- Hernán, M. A., Olek, M. J., & Ascherio, A. (1999). Geographic variation of MS incidence in two prospective studies of US women. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.53.8.1711
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.