Cited by 224Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsMedical Imaging Techniques and ApplicationsAutoimmune Neurological Disorders and Treatments

[ 11 C] (R)-PK11195 positron emission tomography imaging of activated microglia in vivo in Rasmussen’s encephalitis

Banati, R.B., Goerres, G.W., Myers, R., Gunn, R.N., Turkheimer, F.E., Kreutzberg, G.W., Brooks, D.J., Jones, T. +1 more·1999·Neurology

Abstract

This study was designed to explore the feasibility of PET using [11C](R)-PK11195 as an in vivo marker of activated microglia/brain macrophages for the assessment of neuroinflammation in Rasmussen's encephalitis (RE). [11C](R)-PK11195 PET was carried out in four normal subjects, two patients with histologically confirmed RE, and three patients with clinically stable hippocampal sclerosis and low seizure frequency. Binding potential maps showing specific binding of [11C](R)-PK11195 were generated for each subject. Regional binding potential values were calculated for anatomically defined regions of interest after coregistration to and spatial transformation into the subjects' own MRI. In one patient with RE who underwent hemispherectomy, the resected, paraffin-embedded brain tissue was stained with an antibody (CR3/43) that labels activated human microglia. Whereas specific binding of [11C](R)-PK11195 in clinically stable hippocampal sclerosis was similar to that in normal brain, patients with RE showed a focal and diffuse increase in binding throughout the affected hemisphere. In RE, [11C](R)-PK11195 PET can reveal in vivo the characteristic, unilateral pattern known from postmortem neuropathologic study. PET imaging of activated microglia/brain macrophages offers a tool for investigation of a range of brain diseases where neuroinflammation is a component and in which conventional MRI does not unequivocally indicate an inflammatory tissue reaction. [11C](R)-PK11195 PET may hel…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.53.9.2199

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 12 · Cited by 224

Authors
Banati, R. B., Goerres, G. W., Myers, R., Gunn, R. N., Turkheimer, F. E., Kreutzberg, G. W., Brooks, D. J., Jones, T., & Duncan, J. S.
Affiliations
Hammersmith Hospital (GB)
Venue
Neurology
Published
1999-12
Volume
53
Issue
9
Pages
2199-2199
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2043878814
Cited by
224
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
FWCI
5.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Autoimmune Neurological Disorders and Treatments
Keywords
Rasmussen encephalitis, [11C](R)-PK11195, microglial activation, neuroinflammation, brain macrophages, positron emission tomography, binding potential, hippocampal sclerosis, hemispherectomy, biopsy site selection
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Diagnosis, Differential, Encephalitis, Epilepsies, Partial, Feasibility Studies, Female, Hippocampus, Humans, Isoquinolines, Macrophages, Male, Middle Aged, Sclerosis, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Biomarkers, Epilepsy, Complex Partial, Microglia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review