The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Objective changes in motor function during placebo treatment in PD
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the frequency, temporal development, and stability of objectively derived motor changes during placebo treatment in PD and to define the clinical domains and demographic groups most affected. BACKGROUND: Placebo effects are documented in neurology, but the timing and specific disabilities most susceptible to changes during placebo treatment in PD have not been examined. METHODS: The authors examined the placebo-treated group from a randomized, multicenter, placebo-controlled clinical trial of monotherapy ropinerole in PD patients without motor fluctuations. In 105 patients, they evaluated placebo-associated effects on the motor section of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), dividing the motor examination into four categories: tremor, bradykinesia, rigidity, and gait/balance/midline functions. The motor UPDRS and its subscales were compared over time (at baseline and at 4, 12, and 24 weeks) using Wilcoxon's signed rank test. They applied a rigorous definition of placebo-associated improvement as an improvement over baseline score in motor UPDRS of at least 50% or a change in at least two motor items at any one visit by > or =2 points. RESULTS: During the 6-month study, 16% of subjects improved on placebo treatment. The prevalence of response was steady (8 to 9%) at any one visit without a predominance of an early effect. No patient showed a placebo-associated improvement on all visits. All domains of parkinsonian disability were subject to placebo-associated improvement, with a trend toward more response in bradykinesia and rigidity than in tremor or gait/balance/midline function. Gender, age, disease duration, and baseline disability score did not influence the likelihood of improvement in association with placebo treatment. CONCLUSION: Based on a rigorous definition of placebo-associated improvement, prominent improvements in objective measures of PD disability occur during clinical trials. Because placebo-associated improvements occur throughout a 6-month trial, placebo-controlled studies in PD should be at least 6 months to capture early as well as late improvements.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Direct brain infusion of glial cell line–derived neurotrophic factor in Parkinson disease
Gill, S. S., Patel, N. K., Hotton, G. R., O'Sullivan, K., McCarter, R., Bunnage, M., Brooks, D. J., Svendsen, C. N., & Heywood, P. (2003) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm850 · Cited by 1,290
A Comprehensive Review of the Placebo Effect: Recent Advances and Current Thought
Price, D. D., Finniss, D. G., & Benedetti, F. (2008) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.113006.095941 · Cited by 1,146
Expectation and Dopamine Release: Mechanism of the Placebo Effect in Parkinson's Disease
de la Fuente-Fernández, R., Ruth, T. J., Sossi, V., Schulzer, M., Calne, D. B., & Stoessl, A. J. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1060937 · Cited by 991
Placebo Effects Mediated by Endogenous Opioid Activity on μ-Opioid Receptors
Zubieta, J.-K., Bueller, J. A., Jackson, L. R., Scott, D. J., Xu, Y., Koeppe, R. A., Nichols, T. E., & Stohler, C. S. (2005) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0439-05.2005 · Cited by 779
Kaptchuk, T. J. (2002) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-136-11-200206040-00011 · Cited by 616
Metadata
- Authors
- Goetz, C. G., Leurgans, S., Raman, R., & Stebbins, G. T.
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 2000-02-08
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 710-710
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W2090385874
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Objective changes in motor function during placebo treatment in PD. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.54.3.710
- The paper
- Goetz, C. G., Leurgans, S., Raman, R., & Stebbins, G. T. (2000). Objective changes in motor function during placebo treatment in PD. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.54.3.710
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.