The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A 1-year, placebo-controlled preservation of function survival study of donepezil in AD patients
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of donepezil compared with placebo on the preservation of function in patients with AD over a 1-year period. METHODS: This was a prospective, 54-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, survival to endpoint study. Patients were required to have at entry: a diagnosis of probable AD (National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke criteria); Mini-Mental State Examination score of 12 to 20; Clinical Dementia Rating of 1 or 2; modified Hachinski ischemia score < or =4; and capability of performing 8 of 10 instrumental activities of daily living and 5 of 6 basic activities of daily living. Patients (n = 431) were randomized to placebo or donepezil (5 mg/day for 28 days, 10 mg/day thereafter). Outcome measures were the AD Functional Assessment and Change Scale, the Mini-Mental State Examination, and Clinical Dementia Rating scale. At each visit, investigators determined whether predefined criteria for clinically evident decline in functional status had been met. Patients who met the endpoint criteria were discontinued per protocol. RESULTS: Donepezil extended the median time to clinically evident functional decline by 5 months versus placebo. The probability of patients treated with donepezil remaining in the study with no clinically evident functional loss was 51% at 48 weeks, compared with 35% for placebo. The Kaplan-Meier survival curves for the two treatment groups were different (p = 0.002, log-rank test). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with AD continue to show detectable disease progression over time, but treatment with donepezil for 1 year was associated with a 38% reduction in the risk of functional decline compared with placebo.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 · Cited by 88,282
McKhann, G., Drachman, D., Folstein, M., Katzman, R., Price, D., & Stadlan, E. M. (1984) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.34.7.939 · Cited by 27,915
Assessment of Older People: Self-Maintaining and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living
Lawton, M. P., & Brody, E. M. (1969) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/9.3_part_1.179 · Cited by 18,540
The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR): Current version and scoring rules
Morris, J. C. (1993) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.43.11.2412-a · Cited by 9,882
Self-citationThe American Psychiatric Association (APA)
Strentz, T. (2017) · Psychological Aspects of Crisis Negotiation · doi:10.1201/9781315150581-3 · Cited by 1,850
A 24-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of donepezil in patients with Alzheimer's disease
Rogers, S. L., Farlow, M. R., Doody, R. S., Mohs, R., Friedhoff, L. T., & Donepezil Study Group* (1998) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.50.1.136 · Cited by 1,618
Self-citationAn Inventory to Assess Activities of Daily Living for Clinical Trials in Alzheimerʼs Disease
Galasko, D., Bennett, D., Sano, M., Ernesto, C., Thomas, R., Grundman, M., & Ferris, S. (1997) · Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders · doi:10.1097/00002093-199700112-00005 · Cited by 1,194
Rosler, M., Anand, R., Cicin-Sain, A., Gauthier, S., Agid, Y., Dal-Bianco, P., Stahelin, H. B., Hartman, R., Gharabawi, M., & Bayer, T. (1999) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.318.7184.633 · Cited by 943
A 5-month, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of galantamine in AD
Tariot, P. N., Solomon, P. R., Morris, J. C., Kershaw, P., Lilienfeld, S., Ding, C., & the Galantamine USA- Study Group (2000) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.54.12.2269 · Cited by 921
Self-citationRaskind (2000) · doi:10.1212/wnl.54.12.2261 · Cited by 870
Cited by
Knopman, D. S., Amieva, H., Petersen, R. C., Chételat, G., Holtzman, D. M., Hyman, B. T., Nixon, R. A., & Jones, D. T. (2021) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/s41572-021-00269-y · Cited by 2,606
Cholinesterase inhibitors for Alzheimer's disease
Birks, J. S. (2006) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd005593 · Cited by 1,906
Masters, C. L., Bateman, R., Blennow, K., Rowe, C. C., Sperling, R. A., & Cummings, J. L. (2015) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/nrdp.2015.56 · Cited by 1,853
Donepezil for dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease.
Birks, J. S., & Harvey, R. J. (2018) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001190.pub3 · Cited by 1,200
Raina, P., Santaguida, P., Ismaila, A., Patterson, C., Cowan, D., Levine, M., Booker, L., & Oremus, M. (2008) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-148-5-200803040-00009 · Cited by 771
Metadata
- Authors
- Mohs, R. C., Doody, R. S., Morris, J. C., Ieni, J. R., Rogers, S. L., Perdomo, C. A., Pratt, R. D., & for the “312” Study Group
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 2001-08-14
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 481-488
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W2047095305
- Cited by
- 503
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 30.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A 1-year, placebo-controlled preservation of function survival study of donepezil in AD patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.57.3.481
- The paper
- Mohs, R. C., Doody, R. S., Morris, J. C., Ieni, J. R., Rogers, S. L., Perdomo, C. A., Pratt, R. D., & for the “312” Study Group. (2001). A 1-year, placebo-controlled preservation of function survival study of donepezil in AD patients. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.57.3.481
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.