The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Use of anticonvulsants for treatment of neuropathic pain
Abstract
Emerging evidence from animal models of neuropathic pain suggests that many pathophysiologic and biochemical changes occur in the peripheral and central nervous system. Similarities between the pathophysiologic phenomena observed in some epilepsy models and in neuropathic pain models justify the use of anticonvulsants in the symptomatic management of neuropathic pain. Positive results from laboratory and clinical trials further support such use. Carbamazepine was the first of this class of drugs to be studied in clinical trials and has been longest in use for treatment of neuropathic pain. Clinical trial data support its use in treating trigeminal neuralgia, but data for treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy are less convincing. Use of newer anticonvulsants has marked a new era in the treatment of neuropathic pain. Gabapentin has demonstrated efficacy, specifically in painful diabetic neuropathy and postherpetic neuralgia. Lamotrigine has been reported to be effective in relieving pain from trigeminal neuralgia refractory to other treatments, HIV neuropathy, and central post-stroke pain. Results from clinical trials of phenytoin are equivocal. Zonisamide's mechanisms of action suggest that it would be effective in controlling neuropathic pain symptoms. Other anticonvulsants, including lorazepam, valproate, topiramate, and tiagabine, have also been under investigation. Anecdotal experience provides support for studies with oxcarbazepine and levetiracetam for treating neuropathic pain. Evidence supporting the efficacy of anticonvulsants in treatment of such pain is evolving. Additional clinical trials should provide information that will better define their role in neuropathic pain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Fertleman, C. R., Baker, M. D., Parker, K. A., Moffatt, S., Elmslie, F. V., Abrahamsen, B., Ostman, J., Klugbauer, N., Wood, J. N., Gardiner, R. M., et al. (2006) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2006.10.006 · Cited by 756
Diabetic neuropathy: cellular mechanisms as therapeutic targets
Vincent, A. M., Callaghan, B. C., Smith, A. L., & Feldman, E. L. (2011) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2011.137 · Cited by 566
Smoked Medicinal Cannabis for Neuropathic Pain in HIV: A Randomized, Crossover Clinical Trial
Ellis, R. J., Toperoff, W., Vaida, F., van den Brande, G., Gonzales, J., Gouaux, B., Bentley, H., & Atkinson, J. H. (2009) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2008.120 · Cited by 461
“8) (Simpson et al, 2003; Backonja, 2002) and are superior to null results obtained for amitriptyline (Kieburtz et al, 1998; Shlay et al, 1998) and mexiletine (Kieburtz et al, 1998).”
Clinical characteristics and economic costs of patients with painful neuropathic disorders
Berger, A., Dukes, E. M., & Oster, G. (2004) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2003.12.004 · Cited by 351
Chen, P.-S., Peng, G.-S., Li, G., Yang, S., Wu, X., Wang, C.-C., Wilson, B., Lu, R.-B., Gean, P.-W., Chuang, D.-M., et al. (2006) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/sj.mp.4001893 · Cited by 351
Metadata
- Authors
- Backonja, M.-M.
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 2002-09-10
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 5_suppl_2
- Pages
- S14-7
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W2040844744
- Cited by
- 430
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Use of anticonvulsants for treatment of neuropathic pain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.59.5_suppl_2.s14
- The paper
- Backonja, M.-M. (2002). Use of anticonvulsants for treatment of neuropathic pain. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.59.5_suppl_2.s14
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.