Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 280

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A prospective, longitudinal diffusion tensor imaging study of brain injury in newborns

McKinstry, R. C., Miller, J. H., Snyder, A. Z., Mathur, A., Schefft, G. L., Almli, C. R., Shimony, J. S., Shiran, S. I., Neil, J. J.·2002·Neurology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To establish the magnitude and time course of the changes in water diffusion coefficient (D(av)) following newborn infant brain injury. METHODS: Ten newborn infants at high risk for perinatal brain injury were recruited from the neonatal intensive care unit. Conventional and diffusion tensor MRI was performed on three occasions during the first week of life. Regions of injury were determined by evaluating conventional MR images (T1, T2, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery) at 1 week after injury. D(av) values were determined for these regions for all three scans. RESULTS: D(av) values were decreased in most infants 1 day after injury, but injury was not evident or underestimated in 4 of 10 infants despite the presence of injury on conventional imaging at 1 week. By the third day, D(av) values were decreased in injured areas in all infants, reaching a nadir of approximately 35% less than normal values. By the seventh day after injury, D(av) values were returning to normal (pseudonormalization). CONCLUSIONS: MR diffusion images (for which contrast is determined by changes in D(av)) obtained on the first day after injury do not necessarily show the full extent of ultimate injury in newborn infants. Images obtained between the second and fourth days of life reliably indicate the extent of injury. By the seventh day, diffusion MR is less sensitive to perinatal brain injury than conventional MR because of transient pseudonormalization of D(av). Overall, diffusion MR may not be suitable as a gold standard for detection of brain injury during the first day after injury in newborn infants.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.59.6.824

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 280

Metadata

Authors
McKinstry, R. C., Miller, J. H., Snyder, A. Z., Mathur, A., Schefft, G. L., Almli, C. R., Shimony, J. S., Shiran, S. I., & Neil, J. J.
Venue
Neurology
Published
2002-09-24
Volume
59
Issue
6
Pages
824-833
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2019239946
Cited by
280
References
1
FWCI
9.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.