Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 366

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

How often are nonenhancing supratentorial gliomas malignant? A population study

Scott, J. N., Brasher, P. M.A., Sevick, R. J., Rewcastle, N. B., Forsyth, P. A.·2002·Neurology

Abstract

Introduction Palpitations in children is a common presentation to the Emergency Department. Although usually benign and related to anxiety and stress, it is important to rule out the possibility of cardiac arrhythmia. Palpitations cause significant distress for child and parents. Appropriate initial management and onward referral can ensure accurate diagnosis and minimise the need for unnecessary further investigations whilst reducing anxiety in the family. Methods A retrospective analysis of ED notes was undertaken. All children under 16 coded for a discharge diagnosis of arrhythmia or palpitations between October 2013 and October 2015 were included. Areas analysed included presentation, adequacy of history taking, physical examination, performance of an ECG and blood tests, advice prior to discharge and onward referral. Results 84 patients were discharged from ED with a diagnosis of palpitations or arrhythmia. 15 did not meet inclusion criteria. Of the 69 patients analysed, 59% were not asked for family history of cardiac disease, 30% were not asked duration of their symptoms and 58% were not asked about possible triggers. ECG was performed in all but one case. Approximately half of new presentations had blood tests requested. Examination was adequately performed in in almost all patients but pulses were documented in only half of patients.. Appropriate advice was documented for half of the cases. Onward referral was made to the local cardiology clinic in 29% of patients, referral back to GP in 23% and 10% were in existing follow up at specialist tertiary clinics. Conclusions Nearly 15% of patients presenting with palpitations had arrhythmia, commonly SVT. There was huge disparity in the management of palpitations in our ED. ECGs were routinely performed and most patients had an adequate examination. However, all patients should be asked about family history of cardiac disease, triggers for and duration of palpitations. Examination of pulses should be documented and appropriate advice given at discharge. Where clinically indicated, children presenting with palpitations should have FBC and TFTs. Children with recurrent palpitations will benefit from cardiology outpatient review. We plan to create a protocol for assessment of palpitations in the ED to streamline management.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.59.6.947

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 366

Metadata

Authors
Scott, J. N., Brasher, P. M. A., Sevick, R. J., Rewcastle, N. B., & Forsyth, P. A.
Venue
Neurology
Published
2002-09-24
Volume
59
Issue
6
Pages
947-949
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2084623174
Cited by
366
References
0
FWCI
3.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How often are nonenhancing supratentorial gliomas malignant? A population study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.59.6.947
The paper
Scott, J. N., Brasher, P. M. A., Sevick, R. J., Rewcastle, N. B., & Forsyth, P. A. (2002). How often are nonenhancing supratentorial gliomas malignant? A population study. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.59.6.947

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.