Cited by 1Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ResearchAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery

Differences between the modified rankin scale and barthel index in measuring intracerebral hemorrhage recovery at 12 months. (P5.051)

Sreekrishnan, Anirudh, Leasure, Audrey, Zhou, Sonya, Greer, David, Sheth, Kevin·2017·Neurology

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to examine differences in improvement of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) patients across commonly employed neurological assessments including the modified rankin scale (mRS) and the barthel index (BI) up to 12 months post-ICH. Background: The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and the Barthel Index (BI) are both commonly employed measures of recovery used in intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) patients. While these measures have been utilized routinely between 3 to 6 months post-hemorrhage, few studies have examined the utility of these measures as long-term outcome assessments. Design/Methods: 139 patients diagnosed with ICH at Yale-New Haven Hospital were prospectively enrolled between July 1, 2014 and July 1, 2016. Patients were evaluated using the mRS and BI at discharge, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months. Repeated measures parametric and non-parametric testing were conducted to examine improvement in measures over time. Results: Using the BI, there was significant improvement across time points (p = 0.005), with follow-up testing showing improvement between discharge and 3 months (p < 0.001), 6 months (p < 0.001), and 12 months (p = 0.036), and between 3 months and 12 months (p = 0.021). There was no significant trend in mRS scores across all time points in non-parametric testing (p > 0.05). Between individual time points, there was a significant improvement in mRS scores between discharge and 3 months (p = 0.004) as well as 6 months (p = 0.010). Conclusions: These results suggest functional improvement of ICH patients in activities of daily living through 1 year post-hemorrhage. While the mRS has a plateau effect in measuring recovery for this patient population between 3 and 6 months, the BI may be a more sensitive measure for assessing recovery up to 12 months. Disclosure: Dr. Sreekrishnan has nothing to disclose. Dr. Leasure has nothing to disclose. Dr. Zhou has nothing to disclose. Dr. Greer has received personal compensation in an editorial capacity for Seminars in Neurology. Dr. Sheth has received personal compensation in an editorial capacity Current Treatment Options in Neurology. Dr. Sheth has received research support from Remedy Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.88.16_supplement.p5.051

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The mRS has a plateau effect in measuring recovery between 3 and 6 months, while the BI may be a more sensitive measure for assessing recovery up to 12 months.

    “Moreover, while the mRS has a plateau effect in measuring recovery for this patient population between 3 and 6 months, the BI may be a more sensitive measure for assessing recovery up to 12 months [68].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sreekrishnan, A., Leasure, A., Zhou, S., Greer, D., & Sheth, K.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Venue
Neurology
Published
2017-04-18
Volume
88
Issue
16_supplement
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2898799699
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Neurology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Keywords
intracerebral hemorrhage, functional recovery, modified Rankin Scale, Barthel Index, disability assessment, long-term outcomes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review